charmndj
← Study guidesNUR 110 · Exam 3 Study Guide · updated Oct 26, 2026
NUR 110 · Foundations and Health Promotion

Exam 3 Study Guide

The Nursing Process · Oxygenation and Perfusion

Coverage: weeks 7 and 8 of Taylor 10e: the nursing process, Chapters 13 to 20, and Chapter 40, Oxygenation and Perfusion. The guide is ordered by concept, not by chapter, and ends with one patient taken through all five steps.
Not on this exam: Chapter 41 (fluid, electrolytes, acid–base), apart from the two uncompensated respiratory imbalances, which the topical outline puts under oxygenation.
One overlap: the Chapter 40 deck makes the lung-assessment lab material testable here, so breath sounds, percussion notes and breathing patterns are in Part 5.
Format: probably taken online, as Exams 1 and 2 were; item types are not published.
About the blue boxes. A blue box marks something the instructor singled out: said in class, set in red or starred on a slide, or set as a drill or worked case inside a deck.

For exam dates and deadlines, see the semester calendar. Nothing in this guide is tied to a particular term.

First, before anything else

The six things said in class emphasized in class

Six points were named in class as exam content. If an option contradicts one of them, the option is wrong, whatever a slide or the textbook says.

The six points, and what to answer with Said in class by the instructor, as exam content
#PointWhat to answer withTaught in
1ABCDE for a patient with several problemsAirway, breathing, circulation, disability (neuro status, level of consciousness), exposure. Stop at the first letter failing. Maslow, actual-before-risk and high/medium/low are tie-breakers underneath.Part 3, Prioritizing
2ADPIE, the parts of the nursing processAssessment, Diagnosis, Planning, Implementation, Evaluation, in that order. Step 2 is Diagnosis, whatever other name an item uses for it.Part 1
3Problem statementsActual = problem R/T etiology AEB defining characteristics (three parts). Potential (risk) = the statement R/T risk factors (two parts, no AEB).Part 3, Problem statements
4SMART, and patient-specificThe patient is the subject, the criteria come from this patient's own data, and the target is attainable for this patient. A goal you could copy onto the next patient's plan unchanged is not patient-specific.Part 4, Goals: writing one that is SMART and patient-specific
5Short-term and long-termShort-term: by the end of the shift (or sooner). Long-term: by discharge. Classify by the deadline in the stem.Part 4, Goals: classifying and checking them
6A goal not met, or that cannot be metReassess first: find out why, before you revise, extend the date or document. Then continue or modify. Partly met: same rule.Part 4, Evaluating

More may follow. An unmarked topic is not a safe one; it only means nothing was said about it.

Pick a route by the time you have

How to Use This Guide

TimeRoute
20 minutesThe six points above, then the Rapid Review.
An hourThe six stops in “If you have one hour left”, at the end of the Rapid Review.
The whole guideParts 1 to 7 in order, each ending with four scenario questions. Then the Summary Recap, then the practice quiz and practice exam: they are the real question bank.
Orientation

What the course says you must be able to do

The exam is written against the course outline's objectives. Chapter 14 has no objective of its own, and no deck teaches delegation, so those sections follow the textbook.

Which part covers each objective. Nineteen rows, folded shut; open it to check that nothing in the outline is missing.
Exam 3 objectives, mapped to the parts of this guide
#ChapterObjective, in shortWhere it is covered
W7·113 · 14Demonstrate critical thinking in managing patient care.Part 1, all four sections
W7·215 · 16Differentiate the steps of assessment: data collection, analyzing, validation.Part 2, Assessing; Validation, cues and clustering
W7·315Compare and contrast subjective and objective data.Part 2, Subjective or objective
W7·416Components, types, characteristics and steps of nursing diagnoses.Part 3, sections 1–5 emphasized in class
W7·516 · 17Activities of the planning process.Part 3, Prioritizing emphasized in class · Part 4, Planning
W7·617Purpose, components and guidelines for goals.Part 4, both Goals sections emphasized in class
W7·717 · 18Types of nursing intervention, and selecting them.Part 4, Interventions
W7·818Guidelines for implementing interventions.Part 4, Implementing and delegating
W7·918How delegation affects implementation.Part 4, Implementing and delegating
W7·1019Components of the evaluation process.Part 4, Evaluating emphasized in class
Topic20Documentation (a topic bullet).Part 4, Documentation and reporting (taught in NUR 120 Exam 2)
W8·140Oxygenation terminology.Parts 5 and 6, key-term strips
W8·240Ventilation, gas exchange and the structures behind them.Part 5, The oxygen chain
W8·340Signs and symptoms of normal and impaired oxygenation.Part 5, Hypoxia; Respiratory assessment
W8·440Factors influencing respiration; promoting oxygenation.Part 5, How it fails · Part 6, First moves and breathing
W8·540Normal and abnormal diagnostic and lab findings.Part 5, Diagnostics
W8·640Nursing care for an alteration in oxygenation.Part 6, Secretions; Oxygen therapy; Airway procedures
W8·740The nursing process for a patient on oxygen therapy.Part 6, Oxygenation problem statements · Part 7
Lab40skills lab Each oxygen device; flow meter and portable tank; teaching cough, deep breathing, pursed-lip and huff breathing, incentive spirometry; pulse oximetry.Part 6, Oxygen therapy; First moves and breathing · Part 5, Diagnostics
Key terms
ADPIEsystematicdynamic CJMMrecognize cuesprioritize hypotheses Tannercritical thinkingclinical reasoning clinical judgmenttrial-and-errorintuition reflection-in-actionblended competenciesQSEN
Objective W7·1 · Ch 13–14

ADPIE, its names and characteristics emphasized in class

The nursing process is a systematic method, carried out with the patient's participation. It is the way nurses think; the care plan is only the paper that makes the thinking visible.

The parts of the nursing process: ADPIE Said in class by the instructor, as exam content
StepWhat happens in itTaught in
A · AssessmentCollect, validate and communicate data.Part 2
D · DiagnosisInterpret the data: strengths and problems, problem statements, priorities.Part 3
P · PlanningWrite the outcomes and choose the interventions.Part 4
I · ImplementationCarry out the plan, keep collecting data, document.Part 4
E · EvaluationMeasure whether the outcomes were met, then continue, modify or end the plan.Part 4

Five steps, in order, and each depends on the one before it: a wrong database gives a wrong problem and a wrong goal.

The process has five steps, but the ANA lists six standards of practice, because it splits outcome identification from planning. An item asking how many standards wants six; one asking how many steps wants five. Items may also use three other vocabularies.

One process, four vocabularies. Diagnosis holds two CJMM skills in one care-plan column, and Tanner's last two aspects each span two steps.
ADPIEOther namesCJMM skillCare-plan columnTanner aspect
AssessmentAssessingRecognize cuesRecognizing cues: subjective (symptoms), objective (signs)Noticing
DiagnosisAnalyzing · Problem identificationAnalyze cues + prioritize hypotheses (two skills)Analyze cues / prioritize (one column for both)Interpreting
PlanningOutcome identification and planningGenerate solutionsGenerate solutionResponding
ImplementationImplementingTake actionTake actionResponding (reflection-in-action begins here)
EvaluationEvaluatingEvaluate outcomesEvaluationReflecting (on action; in action began during implementation)

The CJMM (NCSBN Clinical Judgment Measurement Model; ATI says “Action Model”) is the structure behind the NCLEX and the program's care-plan form. Generate solutions includes the actions to avoid (“I must not lay her flat” is planning), and evaluate outcomes loops back to the hypotheses. Tanner's four aspects are cyclical: noticing is the first grasp, shaped by what you expected; interpreting uses analytic, intuitive and narrative reasoning; responding includes deciding not to act; reflecting happens in and on action.

“Prioritize hypotheses” is not planning The most-picked wrong mapping, because “priorities” sounds like planning. What is being ranked is explanations: which problem is this, and which is most dangerous if missed. Linking cues to a problem is analyzing cues; ranking the candidate explanations is prioritizing hypotheses; both are Diagnosis, and neither is planning yet. (Ranking the confirmed problem list is filed under both steps: Part 3, What step 2 does.)

The five characteristics

CharacteristicWhat it meansThe give-away in a stem
SystematicAn ordered sequence; each step depends on the accuracy of the one before.“Without an accurate database, the problem list will be wrong.”
DynamicThe steps overlap and run continuously.“During the code she assessed, acted and re-evaluated within seconds.”
InterpersonalThe person is at the center and takes part.“Nurse and patient agreed on the plan together.”
Outcome orientedAimed at measurable results for the patient.“Success is judged by what the patient achieves.”
Universally applicableEvery setting, every age, wellness or illness.“The school nurse and the ICU nurse use the same framework.”
Systematic and dynamic are not opposites Students pick one and assume it rules out the other. Both are true at once: systematic is about logic (the diagnosis cannot be right if the data are wrong), dynamic is about timing (you are still assessing while you implement). A stem about dependency wants systematic; a stem about overlap wants dynamic.
Interpreting evidence belongs to step 2, whenever it happens Deciding whether outcomes were met is evaluation, but interpreting evidence to work out what the problem is belongs to diagnosis. A nurse at the end of the shift who interprets new crackles to explain the patient's breathlessness is diagnosing, not evaluating. Sort by what the nurse is doing, not by the clock.

Taylor also writes the steps as AAPIE.

Objective W7·1 · Ch 13

The heartburn case: label each sentence

Label each sentence before reading the key. (1) After a spicy late dinner you wake with burning in mid-chest; you are young, healthy, with no other symptoms. (2) You decide the spicy food is the cause. (3) You decide to ease it with an over-the-counter remedy before sleeping. (4) You take a liquid antacid. (5) Minutes later the burning is gone and you go back to bed.

The ADPIE heartburn case, keyed Nursing Process Revised deck, slide 4 — the deck's own case study
#StepWhy that step
1AssessmentData: the symptom, when it happened, your baseline health, and the absence of other symptoms.
2DiagnosisA conclusion about what the problem is and what caused it.
3PlanningA goal (relief before sleep) and a chosen means (an OTC remedy).
4ImplementationThe act itself.
5EvaluationThe result compared with the goal: met, so the plan ends.
Sentence 2 is the one most people file under planning “You decide…” sounds like deciding what to do. But you decide what is wrong and why, which is diagnosis; planning starts where a goal and a means appear. “No other symptoms” is a pertinent negative (assessment data); in a real patient, chest burning is not put down to food until a cardiac cause is ruled out. The verb “decide” does not tell you the step; the object of the decision does.
Objective W7·1 · Ch 13–14

Thinking words, in one comparison table

Seven terms items swap for one another. The first three differ by stage; the next three are Taylor's ways of solving a problem; the last is sorted by timing.

TermWhat it isThe tell in a stemExample
Critical thinkingDisciplined, purposeful thinking, inside or outside the clinical setting.The setting is not clinical.Planning how to study for the boards.
Clinical reasoningThe process of thinking about a particular patient's problem; it comes before the judgment.A process applied to a patient.Deciding which labs and notes matter for his new breathlessness.
Clinical judgmentThe result: the conclusion and the action, or the deliberate non-action, that follows. It builds with experience (reasoning across time), which is why new graduates have less of it.An outcome or a decision.“Probably fluid overload; I am calling it in.” “Hold the PRN and keep monitoring.”
Trial-and-errorTry fixes one after another until one works. Not recommended.Repeating the same move.Can't feel a pulse after femoral surgery: move your fingers, press lighter, try again.
Scientific methodSeven steps: identify the problem, collect data, form a hypothesis, plan, test the hypothesis, interpret the results, evaluate. Problem identification comes before data collection, and the hypothesis before the plan. The nursing process is an example of it; the beginning nurse's method.Collects more data before acting again.Compare with the other leg, check pulses above and below, ask about numbness, get a second nurse.
IntuitiveA direct grasp of a situation, grounded in experience, before the measurable signs exist. It must be validated.“Something is off.”The nurse who senses a patient is going downhill before the numbers move.
ReflectionIn action (during implementation), on action (afterwards, as in a debrief), for action (what you will do next time).When the thinking happens.Adjusting the O₂ while watching the saturation is in action.

Five ways to show critical thinking while assessing:

  1. assess systematically;
  2. detect the credibility of information;
  3. distinguish normal from abnormal;
  4. judge the significance of data;
  5. check accuracy and reliability.

Creative thinking (asking “why?” and “what if?”, brainstorming) complements critical thinking and earns its place when the usual solutions have failed. Decision making is choosing among options; its clinical form is the judgment.

“Clinical judgment” offered as a synonym for critical thinking The option defining clinical judgment as “the process of gathering and analyzing data” is the most-picked wrong answer, because judgment does involve thinking. Gathering is recognizing cues and analyzing is reasoning; judgment is the observed outcome. When terms describe one activity at different stages, the question is always which stage.
Trial-and-error usually works, and that is the problem Repositioning your fingers often does find a faint pulse, which is why the option tempts. While you keep trying, a real arterial occlusion goes unrecognized. A method that usually works is still wrong if its failure mode is a missed emergency.
What a student does with an intuition Not act on it alone (calling a rapid response herself), not dismiss it because the vital signs are normal, not chart it as a finding (“patient deteriorating”). Tell the instructor or the RN, and look harder: assess more often for the cues that would confirm or refute it.
Objective W7·1 · Ch 13

Blended competencies and QSEN

There are four blended competencies, “blended” because most nursing actions, suctioning for one, need all four at once.

CompetencyWhat it isA behavior an item will describe
CognitiveThe thinking: knowledge, critical thinking, clinical reasoning.Working out why a patient's output has dropped.
TechnicalThe hands: procedures and equipment.Setting up suction safely; programming a pump.
InterpersonalThe relationship: looks, words and touch that convey worth and build trust.Sitting at eye level, holding the patient's hand while explaining.
Ethical/legalThe standards: acting defensibly, advocating, being accountable.Helping two siblings who disagree about their mother's feeding tube reach the decision she would want.
Talking does not make it interpersonal Mediating between family members is a lot of conversation, so students file it under interpersonal. It is ethical/legal: the competency at work is handling a conflict of values, not building rapport. Classify a behavior by what it is for, not by what it looks like.

QSEN, a refresher (Exam 2). Its goal is the knowledge, skills and attitudes to continuously improve the quality and safety of the health care systems nurses work in. The six: person-centered care, teamwork and collaboration, evidence-based practice, quality improvement, safety, informatics. Advocacy, caring and cultural competence sound right and are not among the six.

Check yourself · Part 1
Name the ADPIE step and CJMM skill: (a) the nurse counts RR 28 and hears new crackles; (b) she decides fluid overload is likelier, and more dangerous, than anxiety; (c) she raises the head of the bed and calls the provider; (d) later she compares his breathing with the goal.
(a) Assessment, recognize cues. (b) Diagnosis, analyze cues and prioritize hypotheses; ranking explanations is not planning. (c) Implementation, take action. (d) Evaluation, evaluate outcomes.
A patient drowsy after an opioid still rouses easily and breathes adequately. The nurse holds the next PRN dose and keeps monitoring. A classmate says that is not clinical judgment, because she did nothing. Who is right?
The nurse. A judgment includes deliberate non-action; Tanner's responding includes deciding not to act.
“My goals were wrong from the start, because I never found out she is hard of hearing.” Systematic or dynamic?
Systematic: an assessment gap carried through to the goals. Dynamic is about steps overlapping in time.
A nurse calmly talks through, with her manager, a colleague who keeps skipping patient identification. Which blended competency is she mainly using?
Ethical/legal: accountability. The conversation is how she does it, not what it is for.
Key terms
databasebaselinecomprehensive initial focusedemergencytime-lapsed subjective dataobjective datasymptoms signsprimary sourcesecondary source IPPAvalidationcue inferenceclusteringdatabase errors
Objective W7·2 · Ch 15

Assessing: purpose, activities, phases and types

Assessing is the systematic and continuous collection, validation and communication of patient data. It builds the database, and the first full assessment gives the baseline every later finding is compared with. The patient is the primary source. Read the record before you walk in, and re-ask only what needs validating. Taylor's four factors that shape what you prioritize: health orientation (wellness or illness), developmental stage, culture and the need for nursing; a detailed sexual history is not a priority for an overnight concussion admission.

Validate assessment data · timing is key Management of Care deck, slide 3 — the whole slide in red

The six activities of assessing: take the nursing history; perform the physical assessment; interview the patient and support persons; review the records; validate the data; and communicate them at the right time. Validation means to confirm or verify, and its purpose is to prevent error or misinterpretation: invalid data lead to the wrong problem and the wrong care.

If an item asks why a nurse validates, the key is about accuracy. Options about legal protection, a complete chart or satisfying the provider are distractors.

The five phases, in the deck's order:

  1. Collecting data;
  2. Identifying cues and making inferences;
  3. Validating data;
  4. Clustering related data and identifying patterns;
  5. Reporting and recording data (the admission database the same day).

Validation comes before clustering: you do not build a pattern out of data you have not checked.

Other lists differ (the course objective names three steps; your NUR 120 guide teaches four). Use these five for any ordering item.

The five types of assessment

Learn them by purpose: an item describes a nurse doing something and asks which type it is.

TypePurposeWhenWhat an item describes
Comprehensive initialA complete database for identifying problems and planning care; the baseline.Shortly after admission.The admission history and head-to-toe.
FocusedData about one problem already identified, or a new or overlooked one.During the initial assessment or as routine ongoing assessment.Checking a new reddened heel on day 3; reassessing pain after a dose.
EmergencyFind the life-threatening problem.A physiologic or psychological crisis.A resident choking; a visitor threatening violence.
Time-lapsedCompare current status with an earlier baseline, and revise the plan.At scheduled intervals. It may itself be comprehensive or focused.The home-health nurse's monthly visit, set against last month's findings.
Communities and special populationsThe same skills applied to a group.Public and community health.Screening a school's pupils.
Three boundaries the distractors live on Focused vs time-lapsed: the home visit gets called focused because the look is narrow, but the comparison with an earlier baseline at intervals makes it time-lapsed. Focused vs comprehensive: a new problem mid-stay gets a focused assessment, not a fresh database. Emergency vs focused: if an airway or a life is at stake, it is emergency, however small the area examined. Name the type by its purpose, not by how much of the body you looked at.

The older deck gives four types (no communities). Taylor gives six, including triage (screening severity to direct follow-up) and quick priority assessment, which are not among the deck's five. NUR 120's “ongoing” assessment is the nearest match to time-lapsed.

Objective W7·3 · Ch 15

Subjective or objective, primary or secondary: two axes

Objective data can be seen, heard, felt or measured by someone other than the person experiencing them: a raised temperature, moist skin, vomiting. Subjective data are perceived only by the affected person: pain, dizziness, anxiety. The care-plan form uses Taylor's other names: subjective = symptoms, objective = signs.

The rule, settled Anything the patient or family reports is subjective, even when it is a number: “my usual weight is 160,” “no BM for 3 days,” “pain is 8 out of 10.” It becomes objective only when a clinician or an instrument perceives it: the scale reading, the charted bowel record. A device reading the patient tells you about is still a report: “my meter said 180” is subjective; the glucose you check yourself is objective. The test: could you have obtained this if nobody had told it to you? Ask who perceived it, not whether it sounds like hard fact.

Two edges. A behavior that expresses a feeling is objective: you see the grimace or the restlessness, even though the pain behind it is subjective. And the interview yields objective data only through what you observe during it (fidgeting, laboured speech), never through what the patient says.

Taylor's definition says subjective data “cannot be perceived or verified by another,” and a usual weight could be verified, which is where the opposite reading comes from. The course reads it as actually perceived by someone else; ATI and both decks agree.

Source and type are two different questions

Subjective or objective asks how the finding was produced. Primary or secondary asks who supplied it. The two vary independently, so all four combinations exist.

Primary source: the patientSecondary source: family, the record, other professionals, the literature
Subjective (stated)“My hip hurts.” “I usually weigh 160.” “I haven't had a BM in 3 days.”The wife: “He didn't sleep at all.” An old chart entry: “patient reports a history of MI.”
Objective (observed or measured)The temperature you take. The grimace you see. Today's weight on the bed scale.Hb 12.4 in the chart. A chest X-ray report. The previous shift's charted vital signs.
NeitherAn interpretation, not data: “appears anxious,” “tolerated well,” “noncompliant.” Chart the behavior and let the reader draw the conclusion.

The patient stays the primary source even when confused or unreliable; you add secondary sources, you do not promote them, and you record that a support person supplied the data. For a language barrier, a professional interpreter, never family: a relative filters and omits, and is not bound by confidentiality (Exam 2).

The two collapses on a two-axis item “The wife saw it, so it's objective.” The most-picked wrong answer: she may have watched it, but it reached you as a statement, so it is secondary and subjective. “The chart is about the patient, so it's primary.” A lab value in the record is secondary and objective; being accurate does not make a source primary. Classify every finding twice: who supplied it, then how it was produced.
The 18-item sort, keyed Nursing Process Revised deck, slide 11 — the deck's own drill (no key on the slide; items paraphrased)

Cover the key and sort them first. Nine are subjective and nine objective.

ItemKeyWhy
“My hip aches”SPain, perceived only by the patient.
“I'm nervous about the operation”SA feeling.
A relative: “She barely slept last night”SFamily report: secondary, subjective.
“I don't think I can inject my husband's medicine”SThe wife's perception of her ability; a learning-need cue.
Restless and agitated in bedOBehavior you observe.
Temperature 99.2 taken by the nurseOMeasured.
A healed scar from an earlier operationOSeen.
Hemoglobin 12.4 on the lab reportOA laboratory value.
“My husband was awake all night”SFamily report again.
“Walking that distance is too much for me”SA perceived limit. “Walked 20 ft, then stopped, dyspneic” is the objective version.
A daughter: “He normally weighs about 160 pounds”SThe trap item. Reported history; today's scale weight would be O.
A heart murmur on auscultationOAuscultated.
Emesis containing bloodOSeen.
Grimacing when turnedOThe objective companion of pain, not the pain itself.
“I'm not sure how to bring my cholesterol down”SA stated knowledge gap.
Blood glucose 107 on the chemistry panelOA laboratory value.
Soft, poorly toned musclesOInspected and palpated.
“It's been three days since my last bowel movement”SThe other trap. Countable, but reported.

The misses are the three that sound like facts (usual weight, no BM, didn't sleep) and the two behaviors that sound like feelings (restless, grimacing). A number someone told you is still subjective, and a behavior you watched is objective even when it expresses a feeling.

Methods, in one line. Observation, interview and physical examination; the exam's purpose is to make direct observations and validate subjective data. Its techniques are IPPA (inspection, palpation for temperature, turgor, texture, moisture and vibration, percussion, auscultation), in that order except the abdomen, where you listen first. Technique is in your NUR 120 Exam 1 guide.

Objective W7·2 · Ch 15–16

Validation, cues and clustering

You cannot validate everything, so validate five kinds of data:

  1. a discrepancy between what the patient says and what you observe (“I'm fine,” with a clenched jaw and guarding);
  2. data that lack objectivity;
  3. a conflict between pieces of data;
  4. an inference, before you act on it;
  5. findings that are out of range or suspicious.

How. Recheck with the right equipment and technique, ask clarifying questions, get a second opinion, compare with norms, and look for congruence between the subjective and objective data. Taylor's example: a 140/90 in a patient whose baseline is 120/80 is rechecked by an experienced nurse at 128/80, and the inference “hypertensive” is rejected; a narrow cuff or recent exertion could have made the first number. Before you treat a number, ask whether the patient or the method produced it.

Validate a lone number; act on a dangerous cluster “Recheck first” is right for one surprising reading in a patient who looks well. It is wrong when several cues agree and the problem is dangerous: newly restless, SpO₂ 86% and RR 28 is not a reading to recheck in fifteen minutes. When in distress, stop gathering data and act. And validation never delays reporting a critical change, which goes to the right person immediately and verbally: a temperature of 102.2 °F on the morning of surgery goes to the charge nurse and the surgeon. A suicidal or self-harm statement is a critical change too: report it at once, verbally; it outranks an isolated, explained abnormal reading such as an asymptomatic BP of 168/96. Validate a surprise; act on a pattern. (Every “what first” rule is in one table in Part 4, Implementing and delegating.)

From a datum to a judgment

A cue is a piece of data; an inference is your judgment about it, and it stays tentative until checked: identify cues → infer → validate → confirm or reject. A cue is anything that departs from a standard, and the standard can be the patient's own usual: 150/90 is a red flag in a patient whose usual is 120/70, and may be normal for a patient with long-standing hypertension. Taylor's four kinds of significant cue: a change from the patient's usual pattern, a departure from a population norm, behavior that works against the person, and a developmental lag.

The data-to-judgment ladder
RungExampleChart it?Where it goes in a problem statement
Subjective cue“I get winded on the stairs.”Yes, in the patient's wordsThe AEB (evidence)
Objective cueRR 26 after walking 20 ftYesThe AEB (evidence)
Inference“Seems depressed”No, not until validated, and then beside its cuesNowhere until validated
NANDA labelActivity intoleranceOn the care planThe problem (first part)
Medical diagnosisHeart failureRecorded as the provider's diagnosisNever after R/T (Part 3, The red rule)
Not one of these: a vague word“Adequate,” “good,” “normal”No; record amounts (“drank 240 mL”)Nowhere

Clustering groups related cues with a framework (Maslow, functional health patterns, body systems) until a pattern appears. A problem is built from a cluster, never from a single cue: tears after surgery may be a healthy release; tears plus refused meals plus staying in bed plus increasing discomfort are a pattern. Before naming it, check with the patient: “It seems bathing has become hard since you became afraid of falling. How do you see it?”

What goes wrong in collecting data: six errors

The deck names six errors in collecting data. Each one leaves a database that cannot support a correct problem statement.

ErrorWhat went wrong, with an example
Inappropriately organized databaseNo framework, so no pattern can appear.
Omitting pertinent dataThe database is incomplete, so a problem gets named on too little data.
Irrelevant, duplicate, erroneous or misinterpreted dataData that don't belong, repeat, or are wrong: they hide the real pattern.
Failing to establish rapport and partnershipThe patient is not a partner in the assessment.
Recording an interpretation instead of the observed behavior“Noncompliant” instead of “took 2 of 4 doses; says they upset her stomach.”
Failing to update the databaseCaused by the belief that assessment ends after admission.
Recording an interpretation as data: the error items are built on “Patient is depressed” reads like a finding and is efficient, so people accept it. It is an inference recorded as data, it shuts down the search for a cause, and it comes from deficient validation. Chart what you saw and heard; leave the label to be validated.

A mistake here usually causes a mistake in naming the problem; Taylor's four diagnostic errors are in Part 3, From cluster to conclusion.

Check yourself · Part 2
The transfer packet lists a BP of 168/94. The patient says, “My pressure always runs high.” You then take it yourself: 150/88. Classify all three on both axes.
Packet: secondary, objective (measured by someone else, reached you through the record). Statement: primary, subjective. Your reading: primary, objective. One topic, three cells.
Two patients. A: SpO₂ 89% on a probe that keeps slipping off a cold finger; she is pink, chatting, RR 16. B: SpO₂ 91%, newly restless, RR 30. Which do you recheck, and which do you act on?
Recheck A: a lone surprising number in a patient who looks well, with a likely method cause. Act on B: three cues agree, and the lower number was the less urgent patient.
On day 2, a patient suddenly slumps in his chair with noisy, snoring breaths. The nurse checks only his airway and breathing. Focused or emergency?
Emergency. A life-threatening problem decides it, however small the area examined. Focused is for a known or newly found problem that is not a crisis.
On day 3, a nurse plans the shift from the admission database, although the patient has since developed a new cough and stopped eating. Which data-collection error is this, and what kind of assessment fixes it?
Failing to update the database, from the belief that assessment ends after admission. A focused assessment of the new problem fixes it, not a fresh comprehensive database.
Key terms
patient problemNANDA-Ihuman response medical diagnosiscollaborative problempotential complication reaching conclusionsproblem-focused riskhealth promotionPED / PES R/TAEB legally inadvisableABCDEMaslow high · medium · lowtie-breakers
Objective W7·4 · Ch 16

What step 2 does, and what a patient problem is

Step 2 (Diagnosis; the Management of Care deck's Analyzing) begins once the data have been collected and reported, and it ends with a prioritized list of validated patient problems. The deck gives it five activities:

  1. Interpret and analyze the patient data.
  2. Identify the patient's strengths as well as the problems (the item students forget).
  3. Formulate and validate the analysis.
  4. Develop a prioritized list of patient problems.
  5. Detect and refer signs of a problem beyond the nurse's experience: if you cannot treat it, you are responsible for getting help. Taylor's SODA check asks whether a problem could be drug-related: side effect, overdose, drug interaction, allergy.
Is prioritizing step 2 or step 3? Both, and an item can use either Analyzing produces a prioritized list; planning's first activity is establishing priorities (Part 4, Planning). Students who learned one slide mark the other wrong. Offered only one of the two steps, choose it. Offered both for a stem that says just “prioritizing,” no source settles it: ask the instructor. Match the stem's wording: “develop a prioritized list of problems” is a Diagnosis activity; “establish (set) priorities” is the first Planning activity.

NANDA International leads the development and classification of nursing diagnoses. Its definition has three load-bearing parts: a patient problem (the course's name for a nursing diagnosis) is a clinical judgment about the responses of an individual, family or community to actual or potential health problems. Why it matters: a priority problem is the basis for selecting interventions to achieve outcomes the nurse is accountable for.

A nursing diagnosis is a NANDA-approved label Nursing Process Revised deck, slide 24 — asterisked

A nursing diagnosis is a label approved by NANDA that identifies specific client needs, so the problem slot is not free text. “Fatigue” and “Activity intolerance” are labels; “tired all the time” and “can't do much” are cues.

The label comes from the list; the etiology and the cues come from your patient.

NNN = NANDA + NIC + NOC: diagnoses, interventions and outcomes.

The older deck's timeline: 1953, Fry calls nursing diagnosis integral to the care plan · 1973, the first national conference on classifying nursing diagnoses · 1982, the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association · 2002, renamed NANDA International · 2004, the NNN alliance. NANDA has 13 domains: health promotion, nutrition, elimination, activity and rest, perception and cognition, self-perception, role relationship, sexuality, coping and stress tolerance, life principles, safety and protection, comfort, growth and development.

Objective W7·4 · Ch 15–16

Nursing, medical or collaborative: treat, report, monitor

The medical model diagnoses and treats disease, illness or injury. The nursing model analyzes and treats the human response to health problems, which in practice means function. After a stroke, the medical question is which artery is blocked; the nursing question is whether the patient can speak, eat and reach the bathroom.

Think like a nurse: the accident case Management of Care deck, slide 16 — the deck's own exercise

A car accident: internal injuries, broken bones, two weeks in hospital, right before finals. What human responses would you have across the slide's five dimensions? A sample answer:

DimensionPatient problems it suggests
PhysicalAcute pain, impaired physical mobility, self-care deficit, risk for infection, disturbed sleep pattern
EmotionalAnxiety, fear about recovery and exams
InterpersonalInterrupted family processes
SocialIneffective role performance, social isolation
Spiritual“Why me, why now?”: possible spiritual distress

The injuries are the physician's diagnoses. What the injuries do to the person's body, feelings, relationships and roles is the nurse's.

The deck sorts problems into three types by who directs the treatment. A mnemonic: the nurse treats the nursing diagnosis, reports the medical one, and monitors for the collaborative problem.

Nursing diagnosisMedical diagnosisCollaborative problem
NamesThe patient's response, or a vulnerability to oneA disease, illness or injuryA physiologic complication the patient is at risk of
Who directs treatmentThe nurse, independentlyThe physicianBoth: physician- and nurse-prescribed interventions
StabilityChanges dailyConstant until resolvedAs long as the risk lasts
One patient after an MIActivity intolerance, acute pain, death anxietyMyocardial infarctionPotential complication: dysrhythmia
The asthma example Medical diagnosis: asthma. Nursing diagnosis: Activity intolerance R/T imbalance between O₂ supply and demand AEB dyspnea on ambulation: how asthma affects daily functioning, with a mechanism after R/T, not “asthma.”
Patient problem vs medical diagnosis — the deck's worked table Management of Care deck, slide 17 — the deck's matching example
Patient problemMedical diagnosis
Ineffective breathing patternCOPD
Activity intoleranceCerebrovascular accident (CVA)
PainAppendectomy
Body image disturbanceAmputation
Risk for altered body temperatureStrep throat

A matching item waiting to happen. One catch: appendectomy is a procedure. Offered beside appendicitis as “the medical diagnosis,” the answer is appendicitis.

Homework: turn ten medical diagnoses into patient problems Nursing Process Revised deck, slide 31 — the nursing column is left blank

One defensible NANDA label each; several are possible, which is the lesson.

MedicalA patient problem it commonly produces
COPDIneffective breathing pattern, Impaired gas exchange
PneumoniaIneffective airway clearance
CHFActivity intolerance, Excess fluid volume, Decreased cardiac output
AppendectomyAcute pain, Risk for infection
Liver failureExcess fluid volume, Risk for bleeding
Renal failureExcess fluid volume
Peripheral vascular diseaseIneffective peripheral tissue perfusion
Alzheimer's diseaseChronic confusion, Risk for injury
Morbid obesityImbalanced nutrition: more than body requirements, Activity intolerance
DiabetesRisk for unstable blood glucose, Deficient knowledge

One disease, several responses. If a physician diagnoses and treats it, it is the medical label; if the nurse can treat the patient's response to it independently, it is the patient problem.

“Potential” does not make it a risk nursing diagnosis Potential complication: hemorrhage and Risk for falls both describe something that has not happened, so students file both as risk diagnoses. The nurse can prevent a fall alone; a bleed needs provider-ordered treatment too, so the nurse monitors for it: it is collaborative. Ask what the nurse could do about it alone. If the answer is “watch and call,” it is collaborative.
Objective W7·4 · Ch 16

From cluster to conclusion: four steps, five conclusions, four naming errors

The deck gives four steps of data interpretation and analysis: (1) recognize significant data and (2) recognize patterns or clusters, both taught in Part 2, Validation, cues and clustering; (3) identify strengths and problems, and potential complications of the diagnosis, drugs and procedures; and (4) reach conclusions.

Taylor makes it five by giving potential complications their own step. Answer four.

Step 4 has five possible conclusions: no problem, possible problem, at risk, actual problem, and a clinical problem other than a nursing problem (report or refer).

“Possible” and “at risk” are two different answers The deck prints them on one line, so students read them as synonyms and write a risk statement for both. Possible means the data are incomplete: assess, and write nothing yet. At risk means complete data show risk factors and no problem: write the two-part statement and prevent. A gap in your data means assess; a risk factor in the patient means write.

Four errors in naming the problem

Taylor's four diagnostic errors:

ErrorWhat went wrong, with an example
PrematureToo little data: “Ineffective coping” after one angry outburst.
ErroneousData misread: “Dysfunctional grieving” for appropriate tears at bad news.
RoutineA habitual label, not tailored: “Deficient knowledge” for a patient who knows plenty but is not motivated.
OmissionThe problem list is never updated as the patient changes.

Premature or erroneous? The pair most often swapped. Premature is a problem of quantity (not enough data); erroneous is a problem of interpretation (enough data, read wrong; the “Mild anxiety” row in Writing wrong diagnoses is the classic case). Nor is a cultural practice nonadherence unless it actually threatens the outcome.

The single cue, and the inference nobody checked A patient who has given his own insulin for three days says, “You give me my shot today.” Students reach for Nonadherence or Ineffective coping R/T depression, because the label is ready-made. It is one cue, and “depression” is an unvalidated inference: he may be tired, frightened by a low reading, or just asking for help today. Ask him. One cue opens an assessment; it never closes one with a label.
Objective W7·4 · Ch 16

Problem statements: types, parts, and what each part drives emphasized in class

The deck names three types: problem-focused, risk and health promotion. The part count follows the type.

Actual = R/T and AEB · Risk = R/T only Said in class by the instructor, as exam content

An actual problem has “related to” and “evidenced by”: three parts, Problem R/T etiology AEB defining characteristics. A potential (risk) problem has the statement and “related to”: two parts, no AEB, as in Risk for impaired skin integrity R/T prolonged immobility.

This settles the one open question about risk statements. It is the rule to answer with.

One Management of Care slide's risk template reads “as evidenced by [risk factors]” (“Risk for falls as evidenced by improper use of crutches”), a newer NANDA-I phrasing. What was said in class overrules it.

“No AEB because there is no problem yet” Nursing Process Revised deck, slide 27 — asterisked

A risk statement predicts a problem; nothing has happened, so there is no evidence to cite. The deck's pair: Impaired skin integrity R/T prolonged pressure on the bony prominences AEB a stage 2 pressure ulcer over the coccyx, 3 cm across (actual), and Risk for impaired skin integrity R/T inability to turn self (risk).

If you can write an AEB, the problem has already arrived: drop “Risk for” and write the actual statement.

Every kind of “problem,” side by side

Seven kinds of “problem”:

KindStatementWhen you reach itNurse's verbInterventions aim toExample
Actual (problem-focused)3 parts: Problem R/T etiology AEB defining characteristicsA validated cluster shows it exists nowTreatReduce or remove the etiologyThe model statement below
Risk2 parts: Risk for … R/T risk factors. No AEBComplete data show risk factors, no signs or symptomsTreat (prevent)Reduce or control the risk factorsRisk for impaired skin integrity R/T prolonged immobility
Health promotion1 part: Readiness for enhanced …No problem, and the patient wants to do better; allowed in any state of healthPromoteReinforce healthy habitsReadiness for enhanced nutrition: a heart-failure patient asks how to cook with less salt
Possible problemNone yet; chart the dataYou suspect something; data are missingAssessConfirm or rule it outOne cue: “I don't feel like getting up”
Collaborative problem“Potential complication: …”A physiologic complication needing provider-ordered treatment tooMonitorWatch for onset; manage with the teamPotential complication: hemorrhage
Medical diagnosisNot a nursing statementA clinical problem other than a nursing problemReport (or refer)Carry out orders; treat the response separatelyAsthma, COPD, MI
Not one of theseNever a statementA test, treatment, equipment, need or goal, a single cue, or a healthy response——Insulin therapy; “needs oxygen”

The older deck lists two (actual and risk). The course answer is three; don't add a fourth (syndrome) type.

Related factors contribute to a problem that exists (actual statements); risk factors make a person vulnerable to one that does not exist yet (risk statements). Risk problems exist because nursing aims to predict, prevent, manage and promote (Alfaro-LeFevre), not only diagnose and treat.

PED: each part drives a different piece of the plan

The deck calls the three-part statement PED: Problem + Etiology + Defining characteristics. Taylor's PES (signs and symptoms) is the same thing.

The model statement Management of Care deck, slide 24 — in red

Constipation R/T inadequate intake of fluids and fiber-rich foods AEB painful, hard stool and bowel movements every 3–4 days.

The template to check every statement against: a NANDA label, a specific etiology a nurse can change (fluids and fiber), and cues in the AEB only.

Part (written after)What it identifiesWhat it drives in the plan
Problem (the label)What is unhealthy about the patientThe goal or outcome: the problem reversed (Part 4, Goals: writing one that is SMART and patient-specific)
Etiology (after R/T)The factors maintaining the unhealthy stateThe interventions: it is what the nurse acts on (Part 4, Interventions)
Defining characteristics (after AEB)The subjective and objective data that signal the problem existsThe evaluation criteria: what you re-measure
PROBLEM Constipation R/T ETIOLOGY inadequate intake of fluids and fiber-rich foods AEB DEFINING CHARACTERISTICS painful, hard stool; BM every 3–4 days GOAL / OUTCOME a soft, formed stool by a stated time INTERVENTIONS fluids and fiber EVALUATION CRITERIA re-measure stool form and frequency The red rule polices the middle box: no medical diagnosis, and no symptom, may sit there.
Problem → goal, etiology → interventions, cues → evaluation criteria. A risk statement has only the first two boxes.
Adding an AEB to a risk statement “to make it stronger” “Risk for falls R/T unsteady gait AEB two falls this week” looks more thorough, so students pick it. But two falls means the problem has happened. A statement cannot be both predicted and proven: “Risk for” and “AEB” never appear together.
Objective W7·4 · Ch 16

The red rule, and every wrong statement corrected emphasized in class

Guidelines for writing problem statements Management of Care deck, slide 27 — the last rule in red
  • Always an R/T. A statement needs a problem and the etiology of that problem.
  • The symptoms are the AEB, part three. The slide adds, with an exclamation mark, that symptoms are not the etiology.
  • Use NANDA terminology, from your NANDA card.
  • In red: “You cannot use a medical diagnoses [sic] for the R/T”, with COPD and diabetes as the slide's examples.

Read the R/T and ask, “Can a nurse act on this?” COPD, diabetes, stroke and heart failure are true and give a nurse nothing to do. Write the mechanism instead, as the asthma example does.

Class exercise: heart failure Nursing Process Revised deck, slide 32 — the deck's class exercise

The slide gives the pathophysiology (the heart cannot pump enough blood for the tissues' needs), the signs (chest pain, fatigue, weakness, shortness of breath, edema, cough), and three answers:

  1. Activity intolerance R/T insufficient oxygen for activities of daily living AEB needing assistance with ADLs. The only complete statement, and the model.
  2. Anxiety. A bare label; it needs an R/T and an AEB (e.g. R/T an uncertain prognosis AEB repeated questions and “I'm scared of what happens next”).
  3. Impaired peripheral tissue perfusion (NANDA: Ineffective). Also a bare label.

Does heart failure cause the activity intolerance? Yes, and it still does not go after R/T. The etiology names the mechanism the nurse can act on, never the disease that produced it.

“Activity intolerance R/T COPD” is true, familiar and wrong The statement most students write, and the reasoning is usually right: COPD really is why he cannot walk to the bathroom. That is what makes the habit dangerous. “COPD” selects no intervention; “imbalance between oxygen supply and demand” selects pacing, rest, positioning and oxygen as ordered. The R/T is not the deepest cause; it is the nearest cause a nurse can change.
Symptoms in the wrong slot: two different mistakes
  • As the etiology: “Ineffective airway clearance R/T coughing and crackles.” Those are how you know. Fix: … R/T thick secretions and incisional pain AEB coarse crackles and a weak, ineffective cough.
  • As the problem: “Cough R/T long history of smoking.” A cough is a cue, not a NANDA response. Fix: Ineffective airway clearance R/T a long history of smoking AEB a productive cough and coarse crackles.
Symptoms have exactly one home, after AEB.
Writing wrong diagnoses Nursing Process Revised deck, slide 33 — all eight are wrong, no key given
Wrong statementThe errorA corrected version
Self-care deficit R/T strokeMedical diagnosis after R/TBathing self-care deficit R/T left-sided weakness AEB inability to wash back and legs
Risk for injury R/T blindnessAn etiology the nurse cannot change… R/T impaired vision and an unfamiliar environment
Post-operative lung congestion R/T bed restThe problem is pathologyIneffective airway clearance R/T immobility and incisional pain AEB coarse crackles
Catheterization R/T urinary retentionThe problem is a treatment; the real problem sits in the R/TUrinary retention R/T … AEB bladder distention
Constipation R/T insufficient intakeA vague etiology: intake of what?… R/T inadequate intake of fluids and fiber-rich foods …
Anxiety and fear R/T separation from parentsTwo problems in oneFear R/T separation from parents AEB crying when they leave; Anxiety separately if supported
Ineffective coping R/T anxietyThe etiology is another nursing diagnosis or restates the problem (also “Impaired comfort R/T pain”)… R/T inadequate support system AEB verbalized inability to cope
Impaired skin integrity R/T not being turned q2hLegally inadvisable: it implies negligence… R/T prolonged pressure on the bony prominences AEB a stage 2 pressure injury over the coccyx
Impaired gas exchange R/T COPDMedical diagnosis after R/T… R/T alveolar-capillary membrane changes AEB SpO₂ 86%, PaO₂ 58
Ineffective airway clearance R/T pneumoniaMedical diagnosis after R/T… R/T thick secretions and fatigue AEB coarse crackles, ineffective cough
Bathing/hygiene self-care deficit R/T fear of falling in the tub and obesity (the Management of Care deck's own three-part example)A correct model of the three parts; asked to fix its R/T, remove obesity, a medical diagnosis… R/T fear of falling in the tub AEB strong body odor, unclean hair, and “I am afraid I will fall”
Needs oxygen R/T SpO₂ 88%A treatment or need as the problem (also “Needs assistance with bathing”)Impaired gas exchange R/T … AEB SpO₂ 88% on room air
Poor home maintenance R/T lazinessA value judgmentImpaired home maintenance R/T a changeable, nonjudgmental factor
Deficient knowledge R/T alteration in parentingClauses reversedImpaired parenting R/T lack of information about newborn care
… due to hostility toward staff“Due to” claims a cause you may not prove“Related to” claims only an association
Mild anxiety R/T impending surgeryA healthy response labeled a problem (erroneous)No statement at all

If the R/T is a disease, a treatment, a fixed trait, another problem or a staff failure, the statement is wrong even when it is true.

Honest is not the same as advisable “R/T not being turned q2h” may be exactly what happened, and students defend it as accurate. But the statement is a legal document, and that is written evidence of negligence nobody has established. Name what you can treat; report the care gap through the proper channel. A statement names the patient's response, never someone's fault.
Objective W7·5 · Ch 16–17

Prioritizing several problems: ABCDE first emphasized in class

When a patient has several problems, the instructor's framework is ABCDE.

Several problems? Rank them A, B, C, D, E Said in class by the instructor, as exam content
LetterWhat you check (ATI)A finding that puts this letter first
A · AirwayOpen? If the patient can speak, it is. Partial obstruction gurgles or is high-pitchedA drowsy post-op patient with a wet gurgle; snoring after sedation
B · BreathingRate for a full minute, depth, pattern, sounds, accessory muscles, colorA rate of 8 after an opioid; too breathless to finish a sentence
C · CirculationBP, pulse, capillary refill, urine output, skinBP 84/50, HR 122; blood soaking a dressing
D · DisabilityNeuro status: LOC, orientation, pupils, movement, speechNew confusion; slurred speech; a limb that will not move
E · ExposureUncover head to toe (privacy, warmth); take a temperatureBleeding under the gown; new hives; a warm, swollen calf; 39.4 °C

Work down the letters and stop at the first one that is failing; that problem is first. D comes after A, B and C because any failure of airway, breathing or circulation can change neuro status, so new confusion sends you back to check oxygenation and perfusion first.

As labels: airway clearance and aspiration risk (A), gas exchange and breathing pattern (B), cardiac output (C), acute confusion (D). ABCDE sorts Maslow's bottom layer; it does not compete with it.

The loudest problem is rarely the first one A post-op patient calls out with pain at 8/10; his drowsy neighbor has a wet gurgle and a weak cough. Or a fever of 38.6 °C with chills, beside a morphine-PCA patient breathing 8 times a minute. Most people go to the pain and the fever. The gurgle is the A; the rate of 8 is the B. Rank by the function that is threatened, not by how loud the finding is. The quiet patient may be the one losing his airway.

The priority ladder: nine rules in order

The deck's three helpful guides are Maslow, patient preference and anticipation, with both physiologic and psychosocial needs counted. Nine rules, in the order you apply them; the last three are tie-breakers, used only when the rules above leave two problems level:

RuleWhat it saysExampleWhen it gives way
ABCDEThe first failing letter is firstThe wet gurgle before pain 8/10Never
MaslowLowest first: physiologic, safety and security, love and belonging, self-esteem, self-actualization. An unmet lower need blocks those aboveA patient in a wet brief cannot join music therapyWhen nothing at the bottom is threatened
Actual before riskAt the same level, what is happening beats what mightIncontinence before Risk for impaired skin integrityAcross levels, the level wins: Risk for aspiration after a failed swallow screen outranks actual problems higher up
Patient preferenceMeet what the patient ranks firstA woman with a pelvic fracture phones about her twins firstWhen it interferes with vital or life-saving care
AnticipationRank a problem high for what it will becomeA bedbound patient with MS who won't turn: prevention is high; ranking it low may be negligence—
High · medium · lowHigh = greatest threat to well-being; medium = nonthreatening; low = not specifically related to the current health problemA hip-fracture patient's colon-screening questions are lowLow is relevance, not severity
Unstable before stable (ATI)Unstable = an acute change: uncontrolled bleeding, severe distress, a fluctuating BPA raised BP in a known hypertensive is stable; the same reading that just jumped is notTie-breaker only
Acute before chronic (ATI)Less time to adaptAn acute asthma attack beats stable emphysemaTie-breaker only
Urgent before nonurgent (ATI)Delay causes harmA bed alarm before a routine complaintTie-breaker only
“Physiologic first” is usually right, which is why it misleads A pneumonia patient, SpO₂ steady on oxygen, wants to wash her hair before her children visit; you planned incentive-spirometer teaching. Maslow points at the spirometer, but nothing physiologic is threatened in the next half hour. Wash the hair, then teach a listening patient. Maslow orders needs that compete; when nothing at the bottom is threatened, the patient's own priority goes first.

The deck's two priority drills

The deck's high-priority question Nursing Process Revised deck, slide 39 — the deck's own question

Which is most likely a high priority: disturbed personal identity, impaired gas exchange, risk for powerlessness, or activity intolerance? Key: Impaired gas exchange, the only one that threatens survival now (the B of ABCDE, the base of Maslow).

Activity intolerance is the one people pick. It is physiologic and led the heart-failure exercise, but it limits function without threatening life. Identity and powerlessness sit higher on Maslow, and powerlessness is only a risk. Two physiologic problems: rank by which function is threatened, and gas exchange beats activity.

Practice prioritizing: rank each set 1 to 4 Nursing Process Revised deck, slide 40 — the deck's drill, no key given

Four problems per set, in no particular order:

Set 1Set 2Set 3
Ineffective sexuality patternsDeficient knowledgeSocial isolation
Risk for impaired skin integrityImpaired gas exchangeAcute pain
Ineffective airway clearanceRisk for infectionChronic low self-esteem
Urinary incontinenceHypothermiaImpaired physical mobility
  • Set 1. Airway clearance, incontinence, the skin risk, sexuality patterns. Incontinence is actual and the skin problem only a risk, so incontinence ranks above the skin risk. An altered sexuality pattern threatens nothing today.
  • Set 2. Gas exchange (B), hypothermia (actual physiologic), the infection risk, knowledge.
  • Set 3. Acute pain, then mobility (the pain is often what keeps the patient still), then social isolation (love and belonging), then chronic low self-esteem (esteem).

The order: ABCDE → other actual physiologic → risk and safety → love and belonging → esteem and knowledge. Within a level, actual beats risk.

Check yourself · Part 3
Day 1 after a bowel resection: Acute pain (9/10, crying); Anxiety; Risk for infection; Deficient fluid volume (BP 88/54, HR 122, 20 mL of urine in 2 hours, quiet and pale). Which comes first?
Deficient fluid volume, the C. The 9/10 is the biggest number and the loudest behavior, which is why it tempts; but pain threatens comfort, and falling pressure with scant urine threatens perfusion. Rank by threatened function, not by the most dramatic number.
Two post-op patients are drowsy on opioids and avoid the incentive spirometer. A has coarse crackles and a weak cough; B has clear lungs and coughs well when prompted. What shape is each statement?
A is actual: Ineffective airway clearance R/T retained secretions and sedation AEB coarse crackles and a weak cough. B is risk: Risk for ineffective airway clearance R/T sedation and reduced deep breathing, no AEB. Same label, same risk factors; whether the cues are present decides the form.
A patient says once, “I don't feel like eating today.” Nothing else has been checked. Four plans: write Imbalanced nutrition; consult the dietitian; check intake, weight and why he isn't hungry; chart his words. Which first?
Check intake, weight and the reason. One cue with missing data is a possible problem. The label would be premature, and the referral waits for data. Fill a data gap before you name anything.
A patient admitted with an asthma attack, now stable, cannot use her peak-flow meter and asks about mammogram scheduling. A student ranks both low: “knowledge deficits are never urgent.” Right?
Half right. The mammogram question is low, unrelated to the current problem; the peak-flow deficit is tied to why she is here, so it is at least medium. Low means unrelated, not a kind of problem.
Key terms
expected outcomeSMARTshort- vs long-term outcome typesindependent · dependent · collaborative direct · indirectstanding orderconcept map five rights of delegationevaluative statement terminate · continue · modifylate entry charting by exceptionISBARR
Objective W7·5 · Ch 17

Planning: priorities first, then outcomes

Planning turns the ranked problems into a written strategy that prevents, reduces or resolves them, built in partnership with patient and family. A goal is an aim to an end; an expected outcome is the expected conclusion to a health problem, judged against specific, measurable criteria (the ANA splits this step into outcomes identification and planning; Part 1, ADPIE). The four planning activities, in order:

  1. Establish priorities, ABCDE first (Part 3, Prioritizing).
  2. Identify and write expected outcomes.
  3. Select evidence-based nursing interventions.
  4. Communicate (document) the care plan.
“Write the goals” is not the first planning activity Students equate planning with writing goals, so they put it first in an ordering item. It is second. You cannot write the right goal until you know which problem comes first.

A written plan serves three purposes: quality care, staff communication and continuity; informal planning lacks a coordinated plan known to everyone caring for the patient. Three stages:

StageWhoWhen, and what
InitialThe nurse who did the admission assessmentOn admission, for every prioritized problem
OngoingAny nurse caring for the patientThroughout the stay; failing to update is a common fault
DischargeThe nurse closest to patient and familyBegins on admission, or before. Teaches self-care for home.
Discharge planning does not start at discharge The most-picked wrong answer is “when the provider writes the discharge order,” because discharge sounds like the end. Discharge planning starts when the stay starts.
Objective W7·6 · Ch 17

Goals: writing one that is SMART and patient-specific emphasized in class

Four kinds of care-plan sentence look alike. The grammatical subject separates them.

ItemSubjectTenseFever-case exampleThe tell
GoalPatientFutureResolve the fever.A broad aim
Expected outcomeThe patient, or part of the patientFutureOral temperature will fall from 101.2 to 99 or below within 4 hours.A measurable criterion
InterventionThe nurse or another caregiverFuture or imperativeRemove heavy clothing and blankets.An action to get there
Evaluation statementThe patient's resultPastGoal met: after 4 hours, temperature decreased from 101.2 to 99.0 orally.Verdict plus data
A “goal” with a number, a time and the wrong subject “The nurse will ambulate the patient 100 ft twice by the end of the shift” has a criterion and a deadline, so it gets accepted. It is an intervention. So is the passive “Temperature will be monitored every 4 hours,” which hides a nurse behind the verb. Check the subject before the components: if the nurse is doing it, it is an intervention, however SMART it looks.
The five components of a goal Management of Care deck, slide 33 = Nursing Process Revised, slide 44 — the same slide in both decks
#ComponentWhat it answersExamples, paraphrased
1Client centeredWho? The patient (the subject)“the patient's temperature”
2BehaviorDoes what? An action verbwill verbalize, ambulate, demonstrate
3Criteria of performanceHow well, how much?the length of the hall, 75% of the meal
4ConditionsWith what help? The circumstanceswith physical therapy's help, after an analgesic
5Time frameBy when? The deadlinewithin 48 hours, by the third post-op day

Taylor's words: subject, verb, conditions, performance criteria, target time. A select-all may mix the vocabularies; pick all five. Not one of these: a nursing intervention, the rationale, the nurse's signature.

Taylor says not every outcome needs conditions. If “conditions” is offered as the missing piece, check first for a missing time frame or a nurse subject.

The verb must be something you can see or hear

Use define, list, explain, describe, identify, verbalize, demonstrate, prepare, select, choose, apply; never know, understand, learn, become aware.

A perfect frame around a banned verb “Will understand insulin self-administration before discharge” has a subject, topic and deadline, so it gets picked. “Understand” cannot be measured; “will demonstrate drawing up and injecting the prescribed dose” can. “Will verbalize understanding” is borderline. The option that names what is said or shown beats the one that says “understanding.”

SMART, and patient-specific

S-M-A-R-T, where S is subject Management of Care deck, slide 34 — the start of the deck's worked fever case

S = subject, M = measurable, A = attainable, R = realistic, T = time-bound. Asked what S stands for in your course materials, answer subject. The slide prints its (S) label beside the subjective cues; “subjective” is a distractor. The fever case itself is in Part 7.

Taylor, the program's worksheet and its rubric expand S as specific. On the exam, S = subject.

SMART goals, and they must be patient-specific Said in class by the instructor, as exam content

A SMART goal has to belong to this patient. That means three things:

  • The patient is the subject, not the nurse.
  • The criteria come from this patient's own data: baseline, cues, charted numbers (“SpO₂ 95% or higher,” “from 101.2 to 99 or below,” “50 ft with a walker”).
  • It is attainable for this patient. The same goal can be right for one patient and wrong for another.

The giveaway in a wrong option is a goal that fits any patient with the diagnosis: “will have improved breathing,” “will tolerate activity.” If you could copy the goal onto the next patient's plan unchanged, it is not patient-specific.

The five components are the parts; SMART is the test. “Will walk 1 mile” on post-op day 1 has all five parts and fails the A and the R.

Two more writing errors, and three rules beyond the components

The deck lists four errors in writing outcomes: the two above (written as an intervention; a verb you cannot observe) and these two.

ErrorLooks likeFixed
Two behaviors in one short-term outcome“Will list the dangers of smoking and stop smoking.”Split by deadline: list three dangers by end of shift; report no smoking by discharge.
Vague“Will cope better.”Will describe two coping strategies to use instead of smoking.

People miss the two-behavior error: one half takes a day, the other months, so it is never met. Three more rules: (1) at least one outcome per problem must, if met, show the problem resolved; (2) the patient must value the outcomes; (3) they must fit the treatment plan: “will drink 2,000 mL per 24 hours” is wrong on a 1,500 mL heart-failure restriction.

Every box ticked, and the problem is still there An overweight patient lists ten low-calorie snacks, keeps a food diary, walks three times a week, and after twelve weeks weighs the same. “Resolved, every outcome was met” is the usual pick; each outcome was only contributing. When the stem lists the outcomes met, ask whether any was the problem reversed.
Objective W7·6 · Ch 17

Goals: classifying and checking them, by deadline and by type emphasized in class

Short-term and long-term

Short-term = by the end of the shift · Long-term = by discharge Said in class by the instructor, as exam content
GoalDeadlineWhat it looks like
Short-termBy the end of the shift (or sooner)“By the end of the shift, will walk 50 ft with a walker, SpO₂ 95% or higher.”
Long-termBy discharge“By discharge, will walk to the bathroom and back independently, without dyspnea.”

A sooner deadline is still short-term: the deck's “within 4 hours” and “within 45 minutes” goals are correct. The deck agrees that long-term outcomes may be used as discharge goals.

Taylor draws the line by duration: long-term is usually more than a week. Answer with the instructor's rule.

The clock in the stem decides it Students classify by how hard the task sounds: “will walk independently” feels long-term, “will state two signs of infection” short-term. Swap their deadlines and the labels swap. Classify by the deadline. A goal with no deadline is neither; it fails the T in SMART.
Practice writing goals for three problem statements Nursing Process Revised deck, slide 45 — the deck's own drill

Three problem statements, no key. One goal each, scorable by a nurse who has never met the patient:

ProblemA goal that passes
Activity intolerance R/T generalized weakness AEB exertional dyspnea and discomfortThe patient will walk 50 ft in the hallway with a walker, keeping HR below 110 and SpO₂ 95% or higher, twice by the end of the shift.
Ineffective airway clearance R/T excessive mucus AEB dyspnea, diminished breath sounds, crackles and rhonchiBy discharge, the patient will cough up secretions after incentive spirometry, with clear breath sounds on auscultation.
Constipation R/T … (finish it first)…R/T inadequate fluid and fiber intake and decreased mobility AEB hard stool, no BM for 3 days → long-term: by discharge, will pass a soft, formed stool; short-term: by the end of the shift, will drink at least 1,000 mL.

The activity goal uses numbers the chart already records. “Will tolerate activity” is also true, but only the goal that can be scored wins.

Four types of outcome, sorted by what changes

Four types. One slide lists only cognitive, psychomotor and affective; a later slide adds physiologic. Answer four.

TypeWhat changesExampleHow you evaluate it
CognitiveKnowledgeWill list three benefits of a healthy dietAsk the patient to repeat or apply it
PsychomotorA skillWill demonstrate the dressing changeAsk for a demonstration
AffectiveValues, beliefs, attitudesWill verbalize valuing his healthObserve behavior and conversation
PhysiologicThe bodyInfant will regain birth weight by 1 monthPhysical assessment
Which outcome is affective? Nursing Process Revised deck, slide 43 — one of only two multiple-choice questions in the decks

Options: demonstrating how to wash a newborn, listing three benefits of a healthy diet, using a walker, and verbalizing that he values his health enough to stop smoking. The key is the last; the first and third are psychomotor, the second cognitive.

Verbalize sounds cognitive, but “verbalize valuing” reports a change in what he values. The category is set by what changes (knowledge, skill, value or body), never by the verb.

Insulin is not automatically physiologic “Will self-inject insulin with correct technique by the end of the shift” is psychomotor: a skill changes. “Fasting glucose will stay below 130” is physiologic. The disease word pulls you the wrong way, and type and deadline are separate axes: this one is psychomotor and short-term. Classify what the patient will do or show, not the disease in the stem.
Objective W7·7 · Ch 17–18

Interventions: typed by who authorizes them

The type is set by where the authority comes from, not by who performs it, how simple it is, or who chose the moment.

Independent, dependent, collaborative Management of Care deck, slide 40 — “Independent” in red
TypeDefinition, paraphrasedExamples
IndependentStarted by the nurse from own knowledge and skill, on a scientific rationale. Needs no physician's order.Positioning, teaching, comfort, emotional support, ADL help, monitoring
DependentCarried out on a physician's order, under supervision, or according to specified routinesMedications, oxygen, IV fluids, enemas, catheters, diet and activity orders, restraints, protocols
CollaborativeDone or decided jointly with another team member, including carrying out PT, OT or dietitian ordersDischarge planning with the social worker, a care conference

Ask “who authorized this?” and the answer is the type.

Taylor's Chapter 17 also calls treatments started by pharmacists, respiratory therapists or physician assistants “collaborative.” Answer with the deck's definition above.

A second axis is delivery. Direct care happens through interaction with the patient, teaching and counseling included. Indirect care is done away from the patient, on their behalf: phoning another discipline, a care conference, charting. The trick rows:

InterventionTypeDeliveryWhy it trips people
Raising the head of the bed; teaching pursed-lip breathing; offering prune juiceIndependentDirectSounds clinical; needs no order
Starting oxygen at 2 L/minDependentDirectFeels like comfort. Oxygen is a drug.
A soapsuds enema; a straight catheterizationDependentDirectFeels basic; invasive treatment
Naloxone for RR 6, under a standing orderDependentDirectThe nurse chose the moment, not the authority
Giving the ordered nebulizer, vs auscultating before and after itDependent, vs independentDirectWatching a drug work needs no order
Carrying out the PT's gait planCollaborativeDirectAn order, but from PT
Phoning the dietitian to arrange a calorie countCollaborativeIndirectThe patient was not there
Sitting with an anxious patient to explore her fearsIndependentDirectCounseling is direct
Charting the patient's responseIndependentIndirect—
Oxygen, enemas and catheters sound like basic nursing. Each needs an order. In a select-all of actions needing an order, the common miss is oxygen, because it feels like comfort any nurse would start. Gases, drugs, invasive devices and treatments need an order. Positioning, teaching, comfort and permitted food and fluid do not.
A standing order the nurse chose to use is still dependent Students call the naloxone independent because the nurse chose when. “Specified routines” in the definition covers protocols and standing orders: they widen what a nurse may start without moving the authority. If the authority came from a provider or a protocol, it is dependent, whoever picks the moment.

“Collaborative and direct” is the usual wrong pick for the dietitian call: “who authorized it?” and “was the patient present?” are separate questions. For any dependent intervention, prescriber and nurse are both liable; never carry out an order you believe is wrong (Exam 2).

Writing the intervention, and the rationale behind it

A written intervention has four parts: date, verb, subject (who is responsible) and a descriptive phrase (how, when, where, how often, how long, how much).

The subject switches sides In a goal the subject is the patient; in an intervention it is whoever is responsible for doing it. Both lists start with “subject,” meaning a different person in each.

Taylor adds a fifth part, the nurse's signature. Answer with the deck's four.

Choosing among interventions, the deck asks five questions: is it realistic; can the nurse do it safely and accurately; are the resources there; does it fit the patient's values; and is it safe alongside other therapies?

Specific beats vague, even when every option is true (the shape recurs in delegation, below, and teaching, Part 6). “Force fluids” is jargon; “encourage fluids as tolerated” is vague, and most picked because it sounds kind; “provide 2,000 mL a day” is correct but leaves the schedule to every nurse. “Offer 60 mL of cranberry or orange juice between meals and keep fresh water at the bedside” wins. The best intervention is one a stranger could carry out without asking you anything.

Rationale. Every intervention needs an evidence-based scientific rationale, cited with textbook and page number, so care is safe and consistent with accepted standards.

The care plan is the written guide, the final product of planning (columns: Part 1, ADPIE). A standardized plan is a base you individualize; a preprinted order set is dependent.

The concept map: the arrows earn the marks Nursing Process Revised deck, slide 64 — the class care-map activity

The medical diagnosis or surgery sits in the center, the nursing problems around it (nine boxes on the slide). The links are tested: in heart failure, decreased cardiac output leads to activity intolerance, then a bathing self-care deficit and a fall risk; fluid overload leads to impaired gas exchange.

Each arrow claims a cause, and some are false: anxiety does not cause fluid overload. If you cannot name the mechanism behind a link, the link is not there.

Objectives W7·8 · W7·9 · Ch 18

Implementing and delegating: reassess first, record last

Implementing is carrying out the plan. Five purposes: achieve valued health outcomes, plus nursing's four aims (Exam 2): promote, prevent, restore, help the patient cope. Seven habits:

DoWhy, or what it means
1. Reassess the patient before you actThe plan was written for the patient as they were. Confirm the action is still safe; clarify any questionable order.
2. Assess, reassess, revise, recordAlfaro-LeFevre's order. Recording is last: it documents the response, not the intention.
3. Organize the resourcesPatient, equipment, environment, personnel, time. When unsure, get more help.
4. Anticipate adverse reactionsUnwanted effects under normal use, not errors: the first walk after surgery, a new IV site that burns.
5. Promote self-careMastery is shown by performance: describing a colostomy-bag change shows knowledge, not skill.
6. Meet the need the patient ranks firstFirst, unless that delays vital care (Part 3, Prioritizing, the physiologic-first trap).
7. Find out why the plan is not followedSix reasons: no family support; sees no benefit; does not value the outcome; adverse effects; cannot afford it; cannot get access.

A care bundle is three to five evidence-based practices applied to every patient, every time (the central-line and ventilator bundles). Doing only some elements loses the benefit: a bundle done 80% of the time does not give 80% of the protection.

Re-teaching is the tempting first move A hypertensive patient has missed half his doses. “Re-teach the risks” is the most-picked answer, and its reasoning is usually right: lack of knowledge often is the cause. That is what makes the habit dangerous; if the real reason is cost, more teaching changes nothing. Find the cause before you treat it.

What do you do first? Every rule in one table

In a what-first item every option is correct; only the order is tested. Every order rule in this guide (the SpO₂ and suction rows are taught in Part 5, Diagnostics and Part 6, Airway procedures):

SituationFirst actionThe tempting wrong firstRule
Any planned intervention (pin-site care)Reassess the patientGather sterile suppliesAssess before you act
A goal not met, partly met, or no longer reachableReassess: find out whyRevise; extend the dateReassess before you revise
A breathless patient slumped in bedSit the patient uprightCount respirations firstPositioning may come before you assess at all
Distress is evident: airway or breathingAct on what you see: position, oxygen per order or protocol, call for help; then complete the assessmentTake the history firstIn acute distress, act first, history later
One surprising number, patient looks wellValidate it: did the method make the number?Treat the numberValidate a lone number
Dangerous cluster (newly restless, SpO₂ 86%, RR 28)Act, and report at once, verballyRecheck in 15 minutesValidation never delays a critical report
SpO₂ alarm; patient breathless, frightened, using neck musclesTreat the patient: upright, oxygen as ordered, helpCheck the probe or nail polishPatient before equipment
SpO₂ alarm; patient pink, calm, talkingCheck the measurement: probe, connections, pulse vs heart rateTurn up the oxygenSame alarm, opposite answer
Mid-suction, HR 84 → 48, SpO₂ 82%Stop, withdraw, oxygenate, then notifyFinish the passStop what is causing harm
A verbal or telephone orderWrite it down, read it backEnter it or act on itRead back before acting
Charting any of the aboveLastChart before giving careDocument last

Delegation: the task moves, the accountability stays

Delegation transfers responsibility for performing a task; the nurse keeps accountability for the outcome. Exam 2's other rule: the nursing process is never delegated (assessment, analysis, planning, teaching, evaluation and any unstable patient stay with the RN).

RightWhat it requiresA typical violation
Right taskThe task is in the delegatee's job description and the agency's policyAsking a UAP to give a medication
Right circumstanceThe patient is stable and the outcome predictable. Any change is reported and the RN reassesses.Delegating vital signs on a patient who arrived from PACU 20 minutes ago
Right personThe delegatee has the training and skill for this taskAn aide never trained on the glucometer
Right direction and communicationSpecific instructions: what to do, what data to collect, when and what to report, no changes without checking. Communication goes both ways.“Check his vitals sometime this afternoon”
Right supervision and evaluationThe RN monitors, follows up, evaluates the outcome and makes sure it is documentedDelegating a task and never checking the result
Same task, two answers: the patient decides it Vital signs on a stable post-op day 3 patient and on one back from PACU 20 minutes ago: “both go to the UAP” is the usual pick. The RN takes the second; the right circumstance is a stable patient. A first walk after surgery is the RN's too: it is an assessment. Stability and predictability decide whether the same task is delegable.
When the delegatee did exactly what they were told Told to “check Mr. Lee's blood sugar,” a UAP gets 52, charts it and tells no one. Students pick right person. The instruction had no reporting threshold, so right direction and communication failed. Better: “Check it at 1130 and tell me at once if it is below 70 or above 250.” If the delegatee followed the instruction exactly and harm followed, the instruction was the failure.
Teaching the incentive spirometer “seems simple” In a select-all of UAP tasks, people include teaching the incentive spirometer because the device looks easy. Teaching is the RN's; intake and output, feeding and turning a stable patient can go. Delegate tasks, never judgment.

In one line: UAP hygiene, feeding, ambulating, turning, I&O, routine vitals; LPN adds routine medications, dressings and reinforcing teaching; RN keeps the nursing process, first-time teaching and the unstable patient. Students asked to do something untrained, such as removing a chest tube, go to the clinical instructor.

Objective W7·10 · Ch 19

Evaluating: a verdict, the data, then reassess emphasized in class

Evaluation judges how well the patient reached each outcome (met, partially met or not met) and uses that to direct care. It is ongoing, not a last step, it leads to changing the plan, and nurse and patient do it together (ANA Standard 6).

VerdictWhenTaylor's smoking example, paraphrased
MetThe criterion is reachedA week with no tobacco use
Partially metProgress, short of the criterion, or some components reachedA pack a day down to 4–6 cigarettes
Not metNo change, or worseNo change in tobacco use
Ask the instructor: progress short of the criterion = partially met The criterion was zero cigarettes and he is down from twenty a day to five; or a goal of 99 or below within 4 hours reads 99.8 at 4 hours, down from 101.2. Students call both “not met.” The deck has no partial example; Taylor's pattern says partially met. Answer that until the instructor says otherwise, and reassess first either way. Progress short of the criterion is partial; “not met” means no change.
The evaluation statement has two parts Management of Care deck, slide 48 — the end of the deck's worked fever case

Part one is the conclusion: met, partially met or not met. Part two is the supporting data: the patient findings or behaviors that prove it (Part 7 walks the deck's whole case).

EntryVerdict on the entry
“Goal met.”No data: the most-picked wrong answer
“1400: T 99.0 °F orally.”No conclusion: a chart entry
“Fever resolved; patient comfortable.”Vague data
“Goal met: after 4 hours, temperature decreased from 101.2 to 99.0 orally.”Both parts: the deck's model

A vague goal produces a vague evaluation. The “99.0” is fine: the trailing-zero ban covers medication doses, not measured values.

Taylor's statement adds a revision and the nurse's signature. “What does the statement consist of?” wants the deck's two parts.

Doing every intervention is not the same as meeting the goal All week the patient was turned every 2 hours, and his stage 2 pressure injury is the same size. “Met, care was given as planned” confuses effort with outcome. It is not met. Evaluation judges the change in the patient, not the nurse's checklist.

Evaluation has five elements:

  1. Identify the criteria: the outcomes from planning (standards are levels set by authority or custom).
  2. Collect data.
  3. Interpret and summarize.
  4. Document the judgment.
  5. Terminate, continue or modify.

Evaluate as early as each time frame allows, not on discharge day.

The nurse is accountable to six groups: patients, families and significant others; colleagues; employers; society; the profession; and themselves, the one people leave out.

After the verdict

If the goal is not met, or cannot be met: reassess Said in class by the instructor, as exam content
  • The deadline passed and the goal is not met (or only partly met). First reassess: not a new intervention, not a new date, not “the goal was unrealistic.” Then find which step failed: data, problem statement, goal or interventions.
  • The goal can no longer be met: a new complication, order or decline makes it unreachable. Don't wait for the deadline: reassess now and rewrite the goal for the patient as they are.

Every option will be reasonable: revise, notify, continue another day, document. Reassessment comes first, because you cannot know what to change until you know what is true now. Documenting comes last.

Evaluate data vs the criteria Met criterion reached Partially met progress, short of target Not met no change, or worse Terminate unless the problem itself persists Reassess first find out why Continue working; needs more time Modify stalled, or not met Go back to where it failed Bad data → Assessing Wrong problem → Diagnosis Unrealistic goal → Planning Not carried out → Implementing Never checked → Evaluating
Short of met: reassess first, then continue or modify. Met: terminate, unless the problem persists. A failure shows up in the outcome, often far from where it began.
The outcome failed, but the error was in the assessment A newborn's “will pass stool within 24 hours” is unmet at 30 hours, and an exam finds an imperforate anus missed at birth. “Rewrite the outcome” is the usual pick, because the outcome visibly failed. The error began in assessing. Go back to the step where the error began.

Five possible revisions, chosen after reassessing: change or delete the problem statement; make the outcome more realistic; raise its complexity (only once met); adjust the time frame; change the interventions. A lifelong loner skipping social activities may have no problem (change the statement); a resident admitted five days ago may need more time (adjust the time frame). The stem's detail picks the revision.

“Continue the plan, since it's working” Met and resolved means terminate. Students keep the plan because nothing is wrong with it. A plan for a resolved problem is clutter the next nurse has to read.

Evaluating the quality of care looks across many patients: structure is the building, process is the actions, outcome is the change in health.

MeasureWhat it measuresExample
StructureThe setting: equipment, policies, staffingRN-to-patient ratio (a number, yet structure)
ProcessWhat nurses doPRN pain doses reassessed within an hour
OutcomeThe change in healthFalls per 1,000 patient-days

Concurrent evaluation is during care, retrospective after discharge: a post-discharge chart review for documented teaching is process, retrospective. What is measured and when are separate questions. A refresher from Exam 2 and NUR 120: quality assurance asks whether care met a set standard, as in a nursing audit; quality improvement keeps testing small system changes (Plan–Do–Study–Act); peer review is by nurses at the same level, not a manager.

Topic: Documentation · Ch 20

Documentation and reporting: the essentials

NUR 120 Exam 2 has already tested this chapter. The NUR 110 deck gives four purposes: a legal record, a communication tool, reimbursement data, and protection of confidentiality and privacy; Taylor calls communication primary. If it wasn't documented, it wasn't done.

Nine rules that come up:

  • Chart the cue, not your inference (Part 2, Validation, cues and clustering).
  • Never chart care before giving it, or sign for care you did not give or verify.
  • Use military time: 9 PM is 2100.
  • For a questionable telephone order, record the exact response, with a second nurse listening and co-signing.
  • Log off when you leave the terminal.
  • Patients may request an amendment; they never alter the record.
  • Incident reports cover near misses and are never mentioned in the chart.
  • Medications go on the MAR (drug, dose, route, time, who gave it; for a PRN analgesic, the reason and the effect), not in the narrative note. The flow sheet holds routine care; the graphic record holds vital signs, weight and intake and output.
  • Do Not Use (Exam 1): U, IU, QD, QOD, MS, MSO₄, MgSO₄, a trailing zero on a dose (write 1 mg) and a missing leading zero (write 0.5 mg); write the word or the drug's full name. “MSO₄ 2.0 mg q.d.” breaks it three times. PO and BID are allowed.

Correcting a paper entry, in order: one line through it so it stays readable; write “mistaken entry”; initial or sign and date it; write the correct entry. In the EHR, mark it mistaken, add the correction, date and initial it. A late entry is legal if labeled: at 1400 you realize flatus at 0800 was never charted, so chart it now, headed “Late entry,” with both times. Squeezing it into the 0800 slot is backdating, which falsifies the record. A correction leaves the original readable; a late entry says it is late.

FormatWhat sets it apart
NarrativeChronological paragraphs; flexible, slow, hard to trend
SOAP / SOAPIEProblem-oriented record with a problem list; medical in origin
PIEProblem, Intervention, Evaluation; nursing in origin; no separate care plan
Focus (DAR)Data, Action, Response; the focus can be a strength
Charting by exceptionOnly exceptions to preset normals are charted
Critical pathwayExpected daily outcomes; only variances charted
Charting by exception and the occasional wheeze The lungs are clear except for an occasional expiratory wheeze in the right lower lobe. “Leave ‘clear’ checked; it is mostly normal” gets picked because CBE skips normal findings. In charting by exception anything uncharted is assumed normal, so the subtle finding most needs writing down.

ISBARR, to report a change. First assess the patient and have the chart in hand.

LetterWhat goes there (Taylor)
IIdentify yourself and your relationship to the patient
SSituation: the problem, in one line
BBackground: diagnosis, history, treatment, latest vital signs and changes
AAssessment: your interpretation (“I think he may be bleeding”)
RRecommendation: what you want
RRead back the orders

NUR 120's deck puts “vital signs stable” under A, as part of the assessment findings. For NUR 110, use Taylor: latest vitals go in B, your opinion in A.

Handoff is at the bedside, with the patient: start by introducing the staff and inviting the patient and family to take part, and report allergies every time. Family members get information only if the patient has authorized it. A verbal order is for urgent situations only: write it down, read it back, prescriber confirms, record it as VO, flag it for signature.

PointTaylor (this exam)Elsewhere in your courses
Who takes itAn RN or a registered pharmacist, so not an LPNNUR 120: “a licensed nurse”
Prescriber signsAt the soonest possible timeWithin 24 hours: NUR 110's own law chapter (Exam 2) and NUR 120

Consultation means another professional assesses the patient and advises you; a referral sends the patient to someone else, and the patient must agree to it.

Check yourself · Part 4
Goal: “By the end of the shift, the patient will walk 50 ft with a walker, with SpO₂ 95% or higher.” At shift's end he has walked 30 ft, stopping when his SpO₂ fell to 91%. Verdict, and first action?
Partially met: progress, short of the criterion. First reassess (why did he desaturate?), then continue or modify. “Goal partially met: walked 30 ft with walker; SpO₂ fell to 91%.”
Classify on both axes: teaching the patient's wife to coach him on the incentive spirometer; a discharge care conference with PT and the social worker; oxygen at 2 L under the unit's protocol when his SpO₂ drops.
Teaching: independent, direct. Conference: collaborative, indirect (patient absent). Oxygen: dependent, direct; a protocol carries a provider's authority.
Delegating vital signs on a stable post-op day 3 patient, which instruction is best: “Vitals q4h”; “Watch his vitals and tell me if anything looks off”; “Vitals at 1200 and 1600; tell me at once if his heart rate is over 110 or SpO₂ below 95%”?
The third: clock times plus a reporting trigger (right direction and communication). The others leave the times or the threshold to the UAP.
At evaluation, a patient's support-group goal is not met and his SpO₂ goal is partially met. Which do you address first?
The oxygenation goal. “Not met” sounds worse, but you rank by the function threatened, not the verdict (Part 3, Prioritizing).
Key terms
ventilationdiffusionperfusion complianceelastic recoilV/Q mismatch hypoxemiahypoxiahyperresonance SpO₂PaCO₂capnography
Objectives W8·1 and W8·2 · Ch 40

The oxygen chain: structures, processes, mechanics and transport

Air moves in, gas crosses into the blood, hemoglobin carries it, the heart moves the blood. Learn each link by what is moving and where.

The structures

The lungs run from the base of the diaphragm to an apex above the first rib and are elastic tissue (alveoli, surfactant, pleura). The right lung has three lobes, the left two. The tested skill is sorting a structure into one of four divisions.

DivisionWhat the deck puts in itWhat it does
Upper respiratory systemNose, sinuses, pharynx, larynx and tracheaConducts, filters, warms and humidifies the air
Lower respiratory systemLungs, pleura, bronchi, alveoliPulmonary circulation and gas exchange. The alveoli are the only place exchange happens
Accessory structuresRib cage, intercostal muscles, diaphragm, sternumThe bellows that change the chest’s size
MediastinumHeart, great vessels, bronchi, trachea, esophagusThe space between the lungs
The trachea is the item you get wrong by knowing too much The well-read pick is “lower”: Taylor and ATI put the trachea at the top of the lower airway. The deck puts it in the upper respiratory system, and the exam was written from the deck. When the course slide and the textbook sort a structure into different buckets, answer with the slide.

The lungs hold more than 300 million alveoli, and the cilia that sweep mucus upward need adequate fluid intake (Part 6, Secretions and inhaled drugs).

Three processes: ventilation, diffusion, perfusion

Respiration is the mechanical and metabolic process moving O₂ from the air into the blood and CO₂ back out, by three processes:

ProcessWhat movesWhere
VentilationAir, in bulk, always from higher to lower pressureBetween the atmosphere and the alveoli: inspiration and expiration
DiffusionGas molecules, each from higher to lower concentrationAcross the alveolar–capillary membrane (external respiration), and again between tissue capillaries and cells (internal, or cellular, respiration)
PerfusionBloodThrough the pulmonary capillary bed and through the body’s tissues; the word covers both
VENTILATION air in and out, high to low pressure PERFUSION blood carries it; the heart pumps it Atmosphere room air, 21% O₂ Alveolus where air meets blood Lung capillary O₂ loads onto Hgb Tissue capillary O₂ unloads from Hgb Cell uses O₂, makes CO₂ DIFFUSION alveolus to blood · external respiration DIFFUSION blood to cell · internal respiration O₂ travels this way CO₂ makes the same trip backward Ventilation’s rate and depth are set by the medulla and pons, driven mainly by rising CO₂ · shaded boxes are blood
The oxygen path: ventilation to the alveolus, diffusion across a membrane twice, perfusion between the two crossings.
Gas crossing the alveolar wall is not ventilation The swap most people make is calling alveolar gas exchange “ventilation”. Ventilation ends when the air reaches the alveolus; crossing the membrane is diffusion. Name the process by what is moving: air, molecules across a membrane, or blood.

The mechanics of a breath

Inspiration is active. The diaphragm contracts and descends, the intercostals lift the ribs, the chest enlarges, pressure in the lungs falls below atmospheric, and air flows in. Expiration at rest is passive. The muscles relax, the elastic lung recoils, and air flows out. Hard breathing recruits the accessory muscles of the neck, back and abdomen; sucking-in between the ribs is a retraction.

The deck lists “increased intrapleural pressure” under inspiration. That is reversed: intrapleural pressure is always negative and grows more negative as the chest expands.

The deck’s nine factors affecting ventilation:

FactorThe fact to hold
Nervous controlThe medulla and pons
Passageway resistanceSecretions, edema, bronchoconstriction
Lung volume and capacityAbout 4,500 mL in an adult
ElasticityDistention and recoil
ComplianceThe ease with which the lung inflates (box below)
Body positionGravity gives greater ventilation upright
MusculatureThe condition of the breathing muscles
Anatomical dead spaceAbout 150 mL that never reaches an alveolus, so a shallow breath wastes more of itself
SurfactantLowers surface tension so the alveoli stay open at the end of a breath; without it they collapse into atelectasis, as in premature infants
Compliance, and the asterisk on emphysema Ch 40 deck, slide 15 — asterisked

The slide stars emphysema beside compliance and gives no direction. What every source agrees on: emphysema destroys the elastic tissue in the alveolar walls, so the lung loses its recoil. It fills and cannot spring back. Lost recoil produces four findings: air trapping (an expiratory problem, hence “obstructive”), a barrel chest, hyperresonance on percussion, and pursed-lip breathing, whose back-pressure holds small airways open long enough to empty. Restrictive disease (pneumonia, fibrosis, atelectasis) is the stiff lung the deck labels decreased compliance.

Emphysema is the lung that fills and cannot empty. Build every answer on recoil and air trapping.

Ask the instructor — does emphysema raise or lower compliance? The sources split. Taylor, the course textbook, says emphysema and aging “decrease elasticity and therefore compliance”. Physiology texts say a lung that has lost its recoil inflates more easily, so compliance is increased. Until the instructor answers: expect items on lost recoil and air trapping, which no source disputes. If an item forces a direction, answer with Taylor (decreased), since exam items are written from the course textbook. If an item asks which disease is restrictive, decide by “inspiration fails”, not by the word compliance.

Volumes and capacities

Seven measurements. Ask of each: one ordinary breath, the biggest breath, the first second, or what is left over?

MeasurementWhat it is
Tidal volume (VT)Air moved in and out in one ordinary breath
Vital capacity (VC)The most air breathed out after the deepest breath in
Forced vital capacity (FVC)The same, blown out as hard and fast as possible
FEV₁ (FEV₂, FEV₃)The part of the forced breath out in the first second (second, third)
Total lung capacity (TLC)Everything in the lungs at maximum inspiration
Residual volume (RV)What is still left after the hardest breath out. Air trapping raises it
Peak expiratory flow (PEFR)The fastest flow of the forced breath out (the peak-flow meter)

What makes you breathe

The respiratory center in the medulla and pons sets rate and depth. It listens to chemoreceptors (central in the medulla; peripheral in the aortic arch and carotid bodies) and to proprioceptors in moving joints, which is why exercise raises ventilation before any gas changes. The main stimulus is rising CO₂ and hydrogen ions (a falling pH); a falling O₂ is weaker. Stimulation raises both rate and depth.

One slide gives the stimulus as “increased pH”, which would be alkalosis. The deck’s other slide, Taylor and NUR 120 say rising acidity; answer that.

How fast and deep you breathe sets the CO₂, and the CO₂ sets the pH (Diagnostics, Arterial blood gases). Chronically abnormal O₂ and CO₂ can desensitize the chemoreceptors; what that means for oxygen in COPD is in Part 6, Oxygen therapy.

Transport, and the heart that moves it

97% of oxygen rides on hemoglobin as oxyhemoglobin; a little dissolves in plasma. Taylor gives 98% and 2%; answer 97%. Hemoglobin carries CO₂ back too (the deck and Taylor call this carboxyhemoglobin), so anemia impairs both. Delivery needs three things (lungs to load, hemoglobin to carry, a heart to move); any one failing starves the cell.

Physiology texts keep “carboxyhemoglobin” for carbon monoxide on hemoglobin (CO₂ rides as carbaminohemoglobin). In an item, the deck’s word means CO₂.

The heart, in four lines:

  • Refresher (NUR 120 Exam 4): right heart → pulmonary artery → lungs → pulmonary veins → left heart → aorta. CO = stroke volume × heart rate, about 5–6 L/min at rest (Taylor).
  • The atria receive blood from the veins; the ventricles pump it out. The coronary arteries fill while the ventricles relax.
  • Conduction: SA node → AV node → bundle of His → bundle branches → Purkinje fibers.
  • Sympathetic stimulation speeds the heart; the vagus nerve slows it, which is why suctioning can drop the rate.

The deck’s five cardiovascular alterations:

AlterationWhat it is, and the discriminator
DysrhythmiaDisturbed rate or rhythm: hypotension, dizziness, palpitations, fainting
Myocardial ischemiaToo little blood to the heart muscle, usually from atherosclerosis
AnginaTemporary supply–demand imbalance (up to about 5 minutes), relieved by rest and nitroglycerin
Myocardial infarctionTissue death, not relieved by rest or nitroglycerin. Women may have fatigue or abdominal pain without chest pain; older adults, sudden breathlessness, fainting or confusion
Heart failureBreathlessness, edema, fatigue. A failing side backs blood into whatever feeds it: left-sided failure floods the lungs (crackles), right-sided failure swells the body’s veins (edema)
Objectives W8·3 and W8·4 · Ch 40

How it fails: which link broke, and who is at risk

The stem names the broken link by the detail it gives. The deck lists eight disease processes, and the table holds all of them: obstructive and restrictive disease, diffusion defects, V/Q mismatching, atherosclerosis, heart failure, anemia and altered oxygen uptake.

Link brokenWhat goes wrongExamples, and what you find
Ventilation: obstructive (COPD)Airways narrowed or blocked; lost elastic recoil; air trapped. Expiration fails. CO₂ rises, O₂ fallsAsthma, emphysema, chronic bronchitis. Wheezes, long expiration, barrel chest, hyperresonance. Pursed-lip breathing targets it
Ventilation: restrictiveChest wall or lungs cannot expand: decreased compliance. Inspiration fails; O₂ fallsPneumonia, pulmonary fibrosis, atelectasis; obesity, kyphosis. Rapid shallow breathing, crackles, dullness. Deep breathing and incentive spirometry target it
Ventilation: driveThe respiratory center is depressed, so breaths come slower and shallowerOpioids and sedatives (box below)
DiffusionThe gas cannot cross the membrane well. Three factors: less surface area, a thicker membrane, a lower partial pressureLobectomy; pneumonia, pulmonary edema; high altitude, toxic fumes
V/Q mismatchAir and blood both present, but not in the same alveoliA clot blocking pulmonary blood flow; alveoli full of fluid or collapsed
PerfusionBlood is not moved, or not moved enough: low cardiac outputHeart failure, MI, dysrhythmia, atherosclerosis. Poor perfusion shows as a falling urine output, hypotension, fainting, a changed level of consciousness or chest pain
TransportToo little hemoglobin, or hemoglobin carrying the wrong gasAnemia, blood loss; carbon monoxide (“altered oxygen uptake”)

The diffusion slide is headed “Four factors influencing diffusion” but lists three; Taylor also gives three. Answer three.

Pneumonia sits in two rows on purpose: consolidation stops filling, and a thick membrane slows diffusion.

Atelectasis feels obstructive and is restrictive Collapsed alveoli sound like a blockage, so the most common wrong answer files atelectasis with asthma. The deck files it restrictive: collapsed alveoli cannot inflate, so the lung cannot fill; asthma stops air getting out. Sort by which half of the breath fails, not by whether something sounds blocked.

Factors across the lifespan

Read every vital sign against its age band; the adult 12–20 matches none of these four columns, and is far off for the two youngest.

InfantAge 1–5Age 6–1265 and over
Rate (per minute)30–6020–4015–2516–24
PatternAbdominal, irregularAbdominal, irregularThoracic, regularThoracic, regular
Breath soundsLoud, harsh crackles at the end of a deep inspiration are normalExpiration longer than inspirationInspiration longer than expirationClear
Chest shapeRoundEllipticalEllipticalBarrel or elliptical

What else changes, in three age groups:

  • Infants: short airways, so aspiration risk. Surfactant forms at 34–36 weeks (premature infants may need it). A fast heart rate limits how far output can rise.
  • Children, 1 to 12: chest-wall fat hides landmarks. Bronchi and eustachian tubes are elongated and less angular. Colds rise with daycare and school: teach hand hygiene.
  • Older adults: smaller, rounder lungs; less alveolar surface area; lost chest-wall mobility; lower PaO₂; secretions pool (pneumonia); barrel chest, kyphosis, rigid airways; less elasticity, muscle power and diaphragm efficiency. Avoid opioids and sleeping pills.

Not an age change: more fat over an older adult’s chest (that is the child’s chest), more elastic tissue, a rising PaO₂.

Rates are Taylor’s Ch 40 table. The Ch 26 vital-signs table (your NUR 120 Exam 1 guide) gives newborn 30–60 and infant 30–50.

Same finding, different age, opposite answer RR 40 is normal at four months and tachypnea at forty. End-inspiratory crackles are normal in a newborn and adventitious after surgery. A barrel chest is expected at 80 and obstructive disease at 35. The distractor applies the adult rule to everyone. Before calling a finding abnormal, find the age in the stem and check which band the normal belongs to.

Environment, lifestyle, health status, and opioids

The deck names four environment-and-lifestyle factors: exposures at home and work, stress, obesity or underweight, and smoking. What to hold, sorted into four areas:

AreaThe fact to hold
EnvironmentAir pollution is the most important environmental cardiovascular risk factor. Occupational dusts (asbestos, silica, coal); high altitude
LifestyleSmoking is the most important risk factor for COPD; secondhand smoke and vaping (EVALI) count. Exercise 2.5–5 hours a week; no caffeine with bronchodilators; yearly flu vaccine from 6 months, plus pneumococcal
Health statusRenal or cardiac disease: fluid overload. Anemia: less O₂ carried. Obesity: the bases rarely expand fully
PsychologicalStress brings hyperventilation (lower PaCO₂) and can trigger bronchospasm; hypoxia itself breeds anxiety
Opioids: the quiet threat to ventilation Opioids depress the respiratory center in the medulla, as do sedatives, benzodiazepines and barbiturates: slower, shallower breathing → hypoventilation → CO₂ retained → hypoxia, and after surgery, atelectasis. With any opioid or sedative, watch for respiratory depression or arrest: the rate, the depth and how easily the patient rouses. A good SpO₂ does not reassure: it can stay normal while CO₂ climbs (Diagnostics, the SpO₂ box). (Ranking this quiet patient against a louder one: Part 3, Prioritizing.)
Objectives W8·1 and W8·3 · Ch 40

Hypoxia: early signs are compensation, late signs are failure

Hypoxia is inadequate oxygen available to the cells, most often the result of hypoventilation. Four look-alike words sit at different places in the chain:

Where, and how you knowTypical causesWhat you see
HypoxemiaLow O₂ in the blood. Measured: PaO₂ below 80, a low SpO₂Any ventilation, diffusion or V/Q problemA number. It usually leads to hypoxia
HypoxiaLow O₂ at the cells. ObservedAny broken link (anemia, a failing pump, carbon monoxide: see the SpO₂ box in Diagnostics)Restlessness, confusion, a racing heart (box below)
HypoventilationToo little air moved: a decreased rate or depthOpioids, sedation, post-op splintingCO₂ retained (hypercapnia), drowsiness, then hypoxia (ABGs)
HyperventilationBreathing faster and deeper than the body needsAnxiety (the classic), pain, early hypoxiaCO₂ blown off: dizziness, tingling or numb fingers, headache (ABGs)
The deck's own question: the signs and symptoms of decreased oxygen Ch 40 deck, slide 24 — the deck's own review question; answered on slides 23 and 30
Early: the body compensatingLate: compensation failing
BehaviorRestless, apprehensive, anxious, dizzy, confusedStupor, coma
BreathingRespiratory rate up; dyspneaRespiratory rate down
Heart and BPHeart rate up; BP up, with a small pulse pressureHeart rate and BP fall
SkinPallorMottling, cyanosis
SpO₂May still read normal, because the fast breathing compensatesDesaturation, a late sign once rate and depth fall

Early, everything speeds up; late, everything slows down or turns blue. The distractor most people pick is cyanosis, the most visible “oxygen” sign. It is late, and in an anemic patient there may be too little hemoglobin for it to appear at all. The earliest sign of hypoxia is a change in behavior, not a change in color.

“His rate has come down from 32 to 10 — he's settling” A rising rate is early hypoxia; a falling rate in a hypoxic patient is late: tiring muscles, or a depressed drive (often an opioid). A patient who is truly improving is more alert and breathing more easily. A vital sign that “normalizes” while the patient becomes less responsive is exhaustion, not recovery.

The three most sensitive tissues each give a sign: the brain (restlessness and confusion first; injury can begin after about five minutes without oxygen), the myocardium (tachycardia, then dysrhythmia and chest pain) and the kidney (a falling urine output). Chronic hypoxia shows in every system: clubbing, an enlarged heart, headaches, altered thinking, chest pain, anorexia, constipation, muscle weakness. Clubbing means months, not minutes; it never answers a question about an acute change.

Breathing terms and patterns, in one table

Each is a rate word, a feeling, or a shape (hyper- and hypoventilation are above).

TermWhat it is, and the cause to know
EupneaRegular, 12–20 a minute in an adult
Tachypnea / bradypneaAbove 20 (fever, pain, anxiety, hypoxia) / below 12 (opioids, raised intracranial pressure). Rate words only: they say nothing about depth
DyspneaDifficult, labored breathing in any position: a symptom reported and a sign seen
OrthopneaBreathless lying flat, relieved by sitting up. Ask how many pillows. Heart failure is the classic cause
ApneaNo breathing: an emergency
KussmaulRapid, deep, labored: the lungs compensating for metabolic acidosis (DKA)
Cheyne–StokesDepth waxes and wanes, with apnea between cycles: heart failure, brain injury, end of life
Biot / ataxicEven breaths broken by irregular apnea / irregular in both depth and rhythm
Air trappingEach breath out is incomplete, so the baseline climbs: COPD
Objective W8·3 · Ch 40 · Lung-assessment lab

Respiratory assessment: inspection, percussion and breath sounds

The lung-assessment lab material is on this exam Ch 40 deck, slide 41 — double asterisk

You are responsible for the lung-assessment lab material and handout, so the thorax-and-lungs lab is examinable here too. For the lobe map, auscultation sites and waveforms, use the Respiratory Assessment part of the NUR 120 Exam 3 Study Guide.

The right middle lobe is auscultated mainly from the front (and the right side).

History. Ask what keeps the patient’s air supply adequate, what they already do to breathe well and which aids they use, and ask and look for the six signs of respiratory disorder: cough, sputum, dyspnea, hemoptysis, chest pain, wheezing. In acute distress, act first and take the history later (first-action table: Part 4, Implementing and delegating). Then inspect, palpate, percuss, auscultate.

Look and feel forWhat it tells you
Rate, rhythm, depthAdult 12–20, regular, inspiration-to-expiration ratio 1:2. Count a full minute if irregular
EffortAccessory muscles, nasal flaring (especially infants), pursed lips. Intercostal retractions may mean blockage: an emergency. Tripod is a cue you observe; what it looks like, and the positions you set up: Part 6, First moves and breathing
Color, chest shapeCyanosis late, clubbing chronic (hypoxia section); barrel chest (the age decides), kyphosis
ExcursionThumbs about 2 inches apart at the 10th rib, from behind, should move apart evenly. Unequal: pneumonia, rib fracture, pneumothorax
Fremitus and crepitusTactile fremitus is decreased with fluid or air between lung and chest wall. Crepitus is air trapped under the skin

Percussion: more air than normal, or less?

Five notes, each reporting how much air lies under your finger.

NoteSoundWhere it is normal, and what it means elsewhere
ResonanceLoud, hollow, low-pitchedNormal lung
HyperresonanceLoud, low, boomingEmphysema: too much air
FlatnessFlatOver bone or heavy muscle
DullnessMedium pitch and intensityNormal over the liver. Over a lung field: fluid or consolidation (a pleural effusion, for example)
TympanyHigh-pitched, loud, drum-likeOver the stomach
Emphysema is the booming one The reflex is that a diseased lung must sound dull. Emphysema is a lung full of trapped air, so it is hyperresonant; dullness over the lungs is the opposite problem, air replaced by fluid or solid tissue. Percussion answers one question: more air than normal, or less?

Breath sounds: normal only in their own place

Normal soundQualityWhere, and the timingWhen it is abnormal
VesicularSoft, low-pitchedMost of the lung fields. Heard mainly on inspiration, which is about three times longer than expirationExpected nearly everywhere
BronchovesicularMedium pitch, blowingNear the main bronchi: between the scapulae and beside the sternum. Inspiration and expiration equalFar out in the lung fields
BronchialLoud, high-pitched, hollowOver the trachea and larynx. Expiration longerOver peripheral lung: dense, consolidated lung carries the tracheal sound outward

The deck describes vesicular sounds as heard “during expiration”. Taylor and NUR 120 put them mainly on inspiration; answer inspiration.

A normal sound in the wrong place is an abnormal finding: bronchial sounds over the right lower lobe are on the normal list and still abnormal there. For the adventitious sounds, ask first: continuous and musical, or popping?

AdventitiousWhat it isWhat you do
CracklesPopping, intermittent: air through fluid, mainly on inspiration. Graded fine, medium or coarseSit up, cough, deep breathe, reassess; report crackles that persist after coughing, or are new and worsening (collapsed alveoli clear; fluid does not)
Wheezes (sibilant)Continuous, high, musical: air through narrowed airways, mainly on expirationAnticipate a bronchodilator, then reassess after it
Rhonchi (the deck’s sonorous wheeze)Continuous, low, snoring: secretions in the larger airwaysHave the patient cough, then listen again; rhonchi clear with a cough
Friction rubGrating: inflamed pleura rubbingAssess pain with breathing; report
StridorHigh, harsh, crowing: upper-airway narrowingAn emergency. Stay with the patient, sit them up, notify immediately
Absent or diminishedAir not reaching the areaEmergent: compare sides, check SpO₂ and effort, notify
Objective W8·5 · Ch 40 · Skills lab: pulse oximetry

Diagnostics: pulse oximetry, ABGs, hemoglobin and the other tests

Pulse oximetry: the ranges

The deck defines SpO₂ as the ratio of oxygenated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin: a percentage of whatever hemoglobin is there. Its figures govern:

ReadingWhat it means for you
95–100%Normal. Write the goal as SpO₂ 95% or higher. Still look at the patient
Below 95%Assess for the cause; compare with the baseline and trend
Below 90%Under the deck’s monitoring line (keep it above 90%): assess, position, oxygen as ordered, report
Below 85% / 75%Further evaluation / life-threatening
A prescribed targetJudge against it. Taylor: 94–98% on oxygen; 88–92% in chronic lung disease (titration: Part 6, Oxygen therapy)

Other figures you may see: Taylor Ch 40, 90–100% (below 80 less accurate); NUR 120’s deck, 92–100% (85–89% possibly normal in chronic lung disease). Taylor Ch 26 gives 95–100%.

Ask the instructor — which normal does this exam use? Until the instructor answers: a healthy adult’s normal is 95–100%. With chronic lung disease, judge against the prescribed target, or 88–92% if none is given. If a key seems to hinge on a reading of 90–94, choose the option that assesses the patient; it is right under every version.
“Is your patient getting enough oxygen?” — SpO₂ is not oxygen content Ch 40 deck, slide 52 — the deck's assigned reading
What SpO₂ cannot tell youThe patient it fools you on
How much hemoglobin there isAnemia. 98% of very little hemoglobin is very little oxygen. Know the hemoglobin before you trust the saturation
Whether the blood reaches the tissuesLow cardiac output, heart failure, shock
Whether the patient is ventilatingThe opioid patient on oxygen: SpO₂ stays normal while CO₂ climbs. Capnography (exhaled CO₂) shows it earlier
What gas is on the hemoglobinCarbon monoxide. The oximeter reads it as oxygenated hemoglobin, so the number looks normal while the cells starve (standard physiology; not in the deck or Taylor)

SpO₂ tells you how full the hemoglobin is, not how much there is or whether it is getting anywhere. Assess the patient, not the number. Pulse oximetry does not replace an ABG.

What interferes with the reading, and what does not

How it interferesCausesThe fix
Weak pulse at the probeHypotension; a cold or vasoconstricted finger (including vasoconstrictor drugs); peripheral vascular disease; edema; low cardiac output; a BP cuff or restraint on the same limbWarm the hand; move off the cuffed limb; use the earlobe, forehead or nose bridge (ear or forehead with low output); an infant’s toe or foot
Light blockedDark nail polish, artificial nails, injected dyes; deeply pigmented skin can overestimateRemove the polish, turn the probe sideways, or change site; with deeply pigmented skin, confirm a doubtful reading with an ABG
Movement or rhythmShivering, tremor; bradycardia, irregular rhythmsSteady the hand; compare the oximeter’s pulse with the heart rate
Does not interfereHypertension. Fever.Treat the number as real

Everything that interferes weakens the pulse at the probe or blocks the light. A reading that is accurate and still misleading (anemia, carbon monoxide) is the box above. The troubleshooting order: the patient and vital signs first, then connections and circulation, then the oximeter’s pulse against the heart rate, then the device on someone else. If the patient matches the alarm, treat the patient before the probe.

Arterial blood gases: the two respiratory imbalances

This exam asks for ABGs without compensation: two pictures, both turned by the CO₂ dial. Breathe less and CO₂ accumulates: the blood turns acid. Breathe more and CO₂ is blown off: the blood turns alkaline. The normals are NUR 120’s starred “memorize” slide, and Taylor agrees.

ValueNormalWhat it tells you
pH7.35–7.45Below 7.35 acidosis; above 7.45 alkalosis
PaCO₂35–45 mmHgThe respiratory number. CO₂ acts as an acid
HCO₃22–26 mEq/LThe metabolic number, set by the kidneys
PaO₂80–100 mmHgOxygenation only; plays no part in naming the imbalance. Hypoxemia: 60–79 mild, 40–59 moderate, below 40 severe (NUR 120)

PaO₂ is oxygen pressure in arterial plasma; SaO₂ is hemoglobin saturation measured on the ABG sample; SpO₂ is the oximeter’s noninvasive estimate of it.

Respiratory acidosisRespiratory alkalosis
The gaspH below 7.35 · PaCO₂ above 45 · HCO₃ normalpH above 7.45 · PaCO₂ below 35 · HCO₃ normal
MechanismHypoventilation: CO₂ retainedHyperventilation: CO₂ blown off
CausesOpioids, sedatives; COPD, asthma; post-op shallow breathing; neuromuscular weaknessAnxiety and panic, pain, early hypoxia, pneumonia, altitude
What you seeDrowsiness, headache, confusion, a slow or shallow rateDizziness, tingling or numb fingers, headache, anxiety, tachycardia

Reading one: NUR 120’s four steps, minus compensation. Read the pH (acid, alkaline, normal); the PaCO₂ (high is acid); the HCO₃ (low is acid); then the one that matches the pH names the imbalance. HCO₃ is normal here only because this exam covers uncompensated respiratory imbalances. Outside this exam, don’t assume the other number is normal: once the body compensates, it moves too. Metabolic imbalances and compensation belong to Ch 41.

“The CO₂ is high, so it must be alkalosis” Students read “high” as alkaline because a high pH is. CO₂ is an acid, so a high PaCO₂ drives the pH down: pH 7.31 with PaCO₂ 54 is respiratory acidosis. The same patient can move between the two: early hypoxia drives fast breathing and a low CO₂; when the muscles tire, the CO₂ climbs. Ask what the breathing is doing to the CO₂, and the pH follows.

Drawing one: Allen test first, specimen on ice, oxygen setting on the requisition, pressure 5–10 minutes (longer if anticoagulated).

Hemoglobin, hematocrit and the other tests

Ask the instructor — hemoglobin and hematocrit norms The course gives no norms; the only figures are in Taylor Ch 37: hemoglobin 12–18 g/dL, and a hematocrit the chapter gives two ways (46–52% in Box 37-5, 40–50% in its text). Until the instructor answers: learn the hemoglobin and the direction. Low hemoglobin or hematocrit means anemia or blood loss; a high hematocrit suggests dehydration. Low hemoglobin cuts carrying capacity: tachycardia and breathlessness on exertion, while the SpO₂ can read normal (the SpO₂ box). Expect items on direction, not range edges.
TestInvasive?What it showsWhat the nurse does
Pulmonary function testsNoLung volume, the mechanics of breathing, diffusion and gas exchange; response to inhalersUsually respiratory therapy. Peak flow: sit or stand straight, blow out hard, best of three; personal best = highest over 2–3 weeks
Sputum cultureNoOrganisms, malignant cells, blood or pusMorning, before breakfast, often 3 successive days; about 1 teaspoon, from a deep cough; sterile container
Chest X-ray (2 views)NoInfiltration, consolidation, an enlarged heart, fluid—
CapnographyNoExhaled CO₂, normally 35–45 mmHg—
ABGYesThe gases aboveAbove
BronchoscopyYesDirect view of the larynx, trachea and bronchiStandard practice, outside the course sources: nothing by mouth until the gag reflex returns.
ThoracentesisYesFluid or air aspirated from the pleural spaceSigned consent; surgical asepsis; patient sits leaning forward over the overbed table, and does not cough, breathe deeply or move during the needle; at most 1,200–1,500 mL at a time

A test is invasive when something enters the body, and the nursing care follows from what it enters: a needle in a sterile cavity is why thoracentesis needs consent and surgical asepsis.

Check yourself · Part 5
Patient C: hemoglobin 7.6 g/dL, SpO₂ 99%, heart rate 118, breathless walking to the bathroom. Patient D: hemoglobin 14 g/dL, SpO₂ 94%, comfortable at rest. Whose tissues are worse oxygenated?
Patient C. 99% of half the normal hemoglobin is too little oxygen; the tachycardia is compensation. Know the hemoglobin before you trust the saturation.
BP 188/104, SpO₂ 91% on room air. A classmate says the pressure is making the oximeter read low. Right?
No. High pressure gives a strong pulse; hypotension loses it. The 91% is real: assess her now. If a finding neither weakens the pulse at the probe nor blocks the light, it does not explain the reading.
Ms E, anxious, tingling fingers: pH 7.49, PaCO₂ 30, HCO₃ 24. Mr F, on a PCA, dozing: pH 7.31, PaCO₂ 54, HCO₃ 25. Name each; who is first?
Ms E: uncompensated respiratory alkalosis. Mr F: uncompensated respiratory acidosis from opioid hypoventilation. Mr F first: his worsens as he sleeps.
A student percusses a patient with emphysema, finds dullness at the right base, and charts it as “consistent with emphysema.” Is it?
No. Emphysema is hyperresonant; dullness means fluid or consolidation, a new finding to report. Ask whether the known condition actually produces the finding.
Key terms
orthopneic positiontripod positionincentive spirometer pursed-lip breathinghuff cough metered-dose inhalerdry powder inhalerFiO₂ Venturi masknon-rebreather absorption atelectasiswater seal activity intolerance
Objectives W8·4 · W8·6 · Skills lab 6–7 · Ch 40

First moves and breathing

The deck's goal is keep the airway open, starting with the cheapest tool: orthopneic position for the conscious patient, head tilt for the unconscious one. Refresher: Fowler's 45–60°, high-Fowler's 90°, semi-Fowler's 30° (Exam 2); semi-Fowler's suits IS, suctioning a conscious patient and trach care. Sitting a breathless patient up is free, instant and harmless, so it may come before you assess at all; every “what first” rule is in one table in Part 4, Implementing and delegating.

PositionWhat it isWhen, and why
High-Fowler'sBolt upright, 90° (Taylor: 60–90°)Dyspnea, orthopnea. The abdomen drops away from the diaphragm.
OrthopneicUpright, leaning forward over the overbed table, arms on a pillowThe deck's position for the conscious, dyspneic patient: a fixed shoulder girdle lets the accessory muscles lift the ribs.
TripodSeated, leaning forward with the arms braced on the knees or a tableUsually a cue you observe (accessory-muscle recruitment) and record as objective data.
Lateral, facing youSide-lyingThe unconscious patient, after an oral airway and while suctioning: secretions drain out.
Head tilt–chin liftA maneuverUnconscious: the tongue is the most common airway obstruction; lifting the jaw lifts it.
Orthopneic, tripod and orthopnea are three different things Orthopnea is a symptom (breathless lying flat; ask how many pillows). Orthopneic is the position you set up. Tripod is usually what a struggling patient does unprompted. Most people pick “tripod” when orthopneic or high-Fowler's is also offered: it sounds like the textbook word for dyspnea. Prefer the position the nurse sets up; if “assist to a tripod position” is the only upright, leaning option offered, it is acceptable.

How to breathe: one table for every technique and device

The deck's four techniques are deep breathing, incentive spirometry, pursed-lip and diaphragmatic; the lab adds huff and cough and deep breathe; the inhalers follow. Two questions sort every row: in or out, slow or fast? Obstructive disease fails on the way out, restrictive disease and atelectasis on the way in (Part 5, How it fails).

TechniqueDirection · speed · holdFor whomStrong teaching line, or the tested error
Deep breathingIn, slow, until the bottom ribs movePost-op; prevents atelectasisAt least every 2 hours post-op.
Incentive spirometerIn, slow, maximal; hold 3–5 s. Never blowPost-op atelectasis“Ten slow breaths every hour while you're awake, when the clock changes the hour, pillow on your incision.” (ATI: 10 an hour.)
Peak-flow meterOut, forceful, fast; best of threeMeasures airflow; not an exercise—
Pursed-lipOut, prolonged: in for 2, out through pursed lips for 4; not forcedCOPD, emphysema, panic“Smell the flowers for two, blow out as if cooling soup for four. Do it on every stair.”
DiaphragmaticBoth: stomach rises, chest still; out through pursed lipsRests the accessory muscles5–10 minutes, 3–4 times a day.
Controlled coughFive slow deep breaths, then one deep cough, incision splinted; every 1–2 hours post-opPost-op; secretions“Five deep breaths, hug the pillow, one deep cough, every hour or two while you're awake.” (Taylor's everyday routine: on rising, before meals, at bedtime.)
Huff coughOut, forced, open mouth and throat; 4–5 huffs, then one coughTires easily, incisional pain, COPD“Breathe out hard, mouth open, as if fogging a window.” Less tiring than a cough.
Assisted (“quad”) coughNurse pushes upward below the diaphragm as the patient exhalesNeuromuscular weakness, spinal-cord injury—
Metered-dose inhalerSlow, deep in, pressing as the breath begins; holdA measured dose per pressErrors: inhaling too fast, no breath-hold, two puffs in one breath. Spacer preferred: less thrush with steroids.
Dry powder inhalerQuick, deep in; breath-activatedCan inhale forcefullyNever exhale into it (moisture clumps the powder).
NebulizerNormal tidal breathingCannot coordinate an inhalerRun it until the cup is empty.
The emphysema patient does not need the incentive spirometer first The emphysema patient “cannot get the air out.” Most people pick incentive spirometry, the best-known device on the unit, but it trains inhalation. The match is pursed-lip breathing; IS is the match for the post-op patient with basal crackles. Match the technique to the half of the breath that is failing.
IS is an inhalation; a peak-flow meter is an exhalation The commonest IS error in a stem is the patient who blows into it, or breathes in fast to make the ball jump; a fast breath fills the open airways and skips the collapsed ones. Slow is the point of IS; only the peak-flow meter and the DPI want speed.

Incentive spirometry, eight steps:

  1. Set the volume goal.
  2. Upright or semi-Fowler's.
  3. Assess pain and medicate first; splint the incision.
  4. Exhale, then seal the lips on the mouthpiece.
  5. Inhale slowly and deeply.
  6. Hold 3–5 seconds.
  7. Exhale normally; rest if light-headed.
  8. 5–10 times every 1–2 hours while awake, then cough.

The deck's “coughing/deep breathing (if not Atelectasis)” is a slip: deep breathing, IS and coughing are how atelectasis is prevented and treated.

The teaching plan has five moves: assess readiness (dyspneic, sedated or in pain is not ready), say why, demonstrate, return demonstration (not “Do you understand?”), which is how a psychomotor skill is evaluated, and anchor the schedule to a habit.

The textbook frequency is the second-best answer “Use it often” (vague), “use it TID” (jargon), “5–10 breaths every 1–2 hours” (correct, but the patient does the scheduling), or “ten breaths every hour while you're awake, when the clock changes the hour.” Most people who studied pick the third, the number they memorized; a post-op patient on opioids will not track it. (Asked only for the frequency, give Taylor's figure.) The best instruction is one the patient can follow without you: a number, a count and a cue they already live by.
Objectives W8·4 · W8·6 · Ch 40

Secretions and inhaled drugs

Fluids and meals. Hydration thins secretions: at least 1.5–2 L a day, more with fever or thick sputum; a cool-mist humidifier for children. Offer small, frequent meals, scheduled 1–2 hours after a breathing treatment, and leave the cannula on during meals.

Same instruction, opposite answer: the heart-failure patient “Push fluids to thin the secretions” is the airway-clearance reflex. In heart failure the figure is a limit of 1–2 L a day, sodium 2,000–3,000 mg: extra fluid goes to the lungs as crackles. The same 2 L is a floor for pneumonia and a ceiling for heart failure. Before you apply a general rule, check the stem for the diagnosis that reverses it.

Chest physiotherapy: percussion with a cupped hand, which should not hurt; vibration; and postural drainage, head down for lower and middle lobes, head up for upper. Never over the spine, sternum, kidneys, lower back or breasts. Taylor does not recommend it after head injury, with uncontrolled hypertension or hypotension, with aspiration risk, for children with pneumonia, for adults with COPD, or for adults after surgery.

Cough medicines: an expectorant (guaifenesin) moves secretions up and is pointless without congestion; a mucolytic loosens them; a suppressant is for a dry cough (codeine sedates and needs a prescription; dextromethorphan is over the counter). Do not suppress a productive cough except for sleep. A cough lasting more than 7 days needs a provider.

Inhaled drugs: bronchodilators open narrowed airways, mucolytics loosen secretions, corticosteroids reduce inflammation. Albuterol causes tremor and palpitations (no extra doses); steroids raise glucose and retain fluid. Refresher from Taylor Ch 30 and your Exam 1 guide: hold about 10 seconds after an MDI puff, a minute between puffs, bronchodilator before steroid, rinse and spit after a steroid. Montelukast prevents attacks and does not stop one.

Objective W8·7 · Skills lab 2–5 · Ch 40

Oxygen therapy: the drug, the devices, the safety rules

Room air delivers 21% oxygen; oxygen is a drug; it is indicated for hypoxemia. It needs an order naming the device, the flow (or %) and the target; give the least that holds the target. In an emergency, don't wait: falling SpO₂ and visible distress justify oxygen under protocol, provider notified. An assistive person may put a cannula back on, never start oxygen or change the flow. Monitor SpO₂, work of breathing, level of consciousness and the skin under every strap.

Targets. The deck monitors to stay above 90%. On oxygen, Taylor titrates most patients to 94–98% and COPD or CO₂ retainers to 88–92%. Normal ranges: Part 5, Diagnostics.

The colleague who says “hold the oxygen” is half-right, which is the problem A COPD patient reads 82% on room air, and a colleague warns that oxygen will “knock out his hypoxic drive.” Most people pick withhold oxygen and notify: it feels cautious, and it is half true, because some COPD patients retain CO₂ when given more oxygen than they need. But hypoxemia kills faster. A non-rebreather at 15 L errs the other way. The key: controlled oxygen (a low-flow cannula or a Venturi) titrated to 88–92%, watching for drowsiness, headache, a falling rate. The danger is too much oxygen, not any oxygen; usually-right reasoning that ends in doing nothing is the trap.

ATI says COPD oxygen is often limited to 2 L/min: a usual starting point, not a ceiling. The ordered target range decides the flow.

Too much oxygen. “Too much oxygen collapse[s] alveoli”: absorption atelectasis, as high concentrations wash out the nitrogen that holds alveoli open. ATI: alveolar damage can begin within 24 hours of near-100%. CNS signs come first (twitching, nausea, seizures); lung signs with longer use (substernal or pleuritic chest pain, cough, dyspnea). Use the lowest concentration for the shortest time. Humidify by need: not required at 4 L/min or less by cannula or for under 24 hours; add it for dryness or nosebleeds, higher concentrations, and tracheostomies.

The devices

DeviceClassFlowFiO₂Used forNursing care
Nasal cannulaLow1–6 L/min24–44%; about +4% per liter, 6 L ≈ 44%Low-to-moderate need; home. Can eat and talkBoth prongs in; check ears and nares; clean and assess every 8 hours. Mouth breathing does not reduce delivery.
OximizerLow (conserving)1–6 L/minNot givenReservoir cannula; conserves oxygen (tank lasts 2–4× longer)Test it during exertion.
Simple face maskLow5–8 L/min; floor 540–60%Moderate need, short term (under about 12 hours)Below 5 L the patient rebreathes CO₂. Dry the skin under it every 2–3 hours; a cannula for meals, per the order. Not for CO₂ retainers.
Partial rebreatherLow10–15 L/minNot in Taylor (ATI: 60–90%)Higher need; rarely usedNo one-way valves; the bag deflates only slightly.
Non-rebreatherLow10–15 L/min; floor 1080–95%, highest of any maskAcute, severe hypoxemia; short termFill the bag first. If it collapses completely, check the connection and raise the flow.
Venturi maskHigh4–6 L/min: the flow printed on the barrel24–40%, fixed by the barrelA precise dose, classically COPDThe barrel or dial sets the %. Keep the entrainment ports uncovered.
High-flow nasal cannulaHighAbove 30, up to 60 L/minUp to 100%, heated, humidifiedICU-level careContinuous monitoring.

The deck's tent mask (face tent), for a face no mask can touch, has no course figures: watch the SpO₂. Sources vary some mask ranges; the floors (5 and 10) never move.

Ask the instructor · “Face mask: turn dial for %, use 10 L” The deck lists “Face mask: turn dial for %, use 10 L.” A mask with a dial that sets the % is a Venturi. Answer “Venturi, at the flow printed on its barrel.” A simple mask has no dial and runs 5–8 L.
Six liters: about 44% on a cannula, an unsafe under-flow on a non-rebreather 6 L by cannula is its top setting, about 44%. 6 L on a non-rebreather is under its floor of 10: the bag empties and the 80–95% never arrives. The pick people make is “6 L is 6 L.” A flow is only safe relative to its device: check the floor before the number.
“High-flow” does not mean “high oxygen” High-flow: a non-rebreather at 95% or a Venturi at 28%? Most people pick the non-rebreather. It is the Venturi: a high-flow device supplies the patient's whole inspiratory flow, so the dose is fixed; on a low-flow device each breath is topped up with room air. Flow class and FiO₂ are separate axes; classify each on its own.
Turning up the Venturi's flow changes nothing A patient on a 28% Venturi needs 35%, and a new nurse turns the flow from 4 to 8 L. Nothing changed: the barrel sets the dose; the flow only drives it. Fit the 35% barrel at its printed flow. “More flow, more oxygen” is true on a cannula, which is why the habit carries over. Change the control that sets the dose.

Applying and weaning. Check the order (device, flow or %, target) → explain the device and why, and post the no-smoking signs → set the flow and confirm it at the device before it touches the face → apply → reassess. Wean by changing device, never by running a mask below its floor. Document the device, flow, assessment before and after, and every flow change.

Wall flowmeter: the green wall outlet, the clear tube with a float ball and the control knob; set the middle of the ball on the ordered line.

No course text describes the flowmeter; these are standard equipment conventions. Check them against the lab's model.

Portable cylinder, six steps:

  1. Secure it upright, never between the patient's legs.
  2. Read the contents gauge, the one nearer the tank: use it only above 500 psi.
  3. Open the valve counterclockwise.
  4. Set and confirm the flow.
  5. Make sure oxygen is waiting at the destination.
  6. Close it clockwise and bleed the gauge.

An oxygen concentrator never runs out, but it needs power.

Fire safety: hazard, then rule

Oxygen does not burn; it supports combustion, so every rule removes an ignition source or a fuel.

HazardRule
Flame, smokingNo open flames; “No smoking” signs in plain view. At home, oxygen at least 6 feet from stoves, fireplaces and heaters.
SparksElectrical equipment in good working order: a frayed cord sparks. No electric blankets.
StaticNo synthetic fabrics: they build static. Cotton bedding.
Oils, petroleumNo oils: they ignite spontaneously in oxygen. A water-based lubricant for lips and nares.
Alcohol gel · the homeLet gel dry before touching the equipment. Smoke detector, extinguisher; tell the fire department oxygen is in use.
Home oxygen teaching: name the hazards in this patient's house A patient going home on oxygen cooks on a gas stove and has a wood fireplace. “Oxygen is flammable, so be careful” is vague; “keep oxygen away from heat sources” is true but abstract, and most people pick it; “turn it off while you cook” is unsafe if he needs it continuously. “Keep the oxygen and tubing at least 6 feet from the stove and the fireplace, and no one smokes in the house” wins. Give the distance and name the patient's actual hazards, not the category.
Objective W8·6 · Ch 40

Airway procedures: suction, artificial airways, chest tubes, CPR

Suction only when indicated, never on a schedule: visible or audible secretions, a falling SpO₂, coarse crackles over the trachea, or a cough too weak to clear them.

SuctioningValue
PressureNo more than 150 mmHg adult · 125 child · 100 infant
Passes10–15 seconds each (child, tracheal: under 5–10 seconds); no more than 3, at least 30 seconds apart
OxygenTracheal: hyperoxygenate at least 30 seconds before and after
Suction onNever on the way in; intermittent, only while withdrawing
DepthNasopharyngeal: nose tip to earlobe. Tracheal: no more than 1 cm past the tube; meet resistance and you are at the carina, so pull back half an inch before suctioning
Order of sitesTrachea before mouth; nose before mouth
Asepsis · salineSterile in hospital, clean at home · saline instillation not recommended
DelegationA trained assistive person may do oropharyngeal suctioning; tracheal suctioning and trach care are never delegated

Tracheal suctioning, in order: assess the need → position and hyperoxygenate → insert without suction → suction while withdrawing → reoxygenate and wait before another pass → mouth last, then reassess and document the secretions.

The heart rate drops mid-pass: stop, don't finish On the second pass the heart rate falls from 84 to 48 and SpO₂ to 82%. Most people pick “finish the pass, since secretions are still present”, because finishing feels responsible. The catheter is stimulating the vagus nerve and taking the oxygen with it. Stop, withdraw, oxygenate, then notify; charting is last. When a procedure is causing the harm, stopping it comes first.
Three habits that feel efficient and are wrong Mouth first contaminates the catheter for the trachea. Suction on during insertion strips oxygen when it can remove nothing. A squirt of saline has a logic to it and is not recommended; thin secretions with fluids and humidity. Clean site before dirty, and “it has always been done” is not evidence.

Artificial airways and tracheostomy care

The deck's three airways and two trach types, cuffed and cuffless:

AirwayWhat to know
Oral airwayUnconscious patients only. Size: mouth corner to jaw angle. Insert tip up, rotate 180°. Never tape it: pushing it out means waking up. Out every 4 hours for mouth care.
Nasal airwayTolerated when conscious. Size: nose tip to earlobe; water-soluble lubricant; switch nostrils every 8 hours.
Endotracheal tubeCuff pressure 20–30 cm H₂O, checked every shift.
TracheostomyOuter and inner cannula, obturator kept at the bedside. Cuffed: seals, prevents aspiration, needed for ventilation; cuff 20–30 cm H₂O. Uncuffed: intact gag and cough, children under 6. Fenestrated: allows speech once capped.

Trach care: sterile; suction first if needed; inner cannula at least every 8 hours (every 4 if secretions are heavy); clean from the stoma outward, one applicator per stroke; a pre-made dressing, never cut gauze; change ties with a second person holding the tube, or put the new ties on before the old come off, snug enough that only a finger or two fits beneath. At the bedside: obturator, a spare tube and one a size smaller, suction, oxygen, a bag.

The one tracheostomy emergency Thick secretions can wait a few minutes; a tube that has come out cannot. Obturator into the spare tube, insert, remove the obturator, secure, listen. If it will not go back: call for help, cover the stoma, prepare to bag. Rank a dislodged trach above every other trach finding.

Chest tubes

The deck's four actions: assist with insertion and removal; monitor respiratory status and vital signs; check the dressing; keep the system patent and intact. The tube drains air (placed high) or fluid (placed low) from the pleural space; the water seal lets air out and not back in.

Chest tubeWhat it looks like
ExpectedTidaling (shows patency); gentle bubbling in the suction chamber; the unit below the chest, no dependent loops; the drainage level marked every shift.
A problemContinuous bubbling in the water seal: an air leak. A sudden increase or bright red drainage: notify at once. Tidaling stops: check for a kink or loop before you conclude the lung has re-expanded.
NeverClamp it to move the patient or fix a disconnection; milk or strip the tubing; empty the chamber.
Clamping feels protective; it is the danger A transporter asks you to clamp the tube “so nothing leaks.” Most people agree, because it seems careful and used to be routine. Blocking the exit traps air in the chest and risks a tension pneumothorax. Never clamp to move a patient or to fix a disconnection: drain by gravity, or put the open end under sterile water.

CPR, choking and the bag

Ask the instructor · ABC with 1.5–2-second breaths, or CAB with 1-second breaths? The deck teaches ABC: open the airway, two breaths of 1.5–2 seconds, then pulse and compressions. Taylor and current BLS teach CAB, compressions first, with 1-second breaths. ABCDE for ranking problems is not in dispute (Part 3, Prioritizing). In the meantime: for a pulseless adult answer compressions first, 30:2; an item quoting the slide is testing the slide.

Taylor: check breathing and the carotid pulse together in no more than 10 seconds; compressions at least 2 inches deep, 100–120 a minute, with full recoil.

Choking. If the person can cough forcefully, encourage the cough and do not interfere; if not, ask “Are you choking?” and give abdominal thrusts (never to an infant). If they become unresponsive, start CPR. Bag-valve mask: one breath every 6 seconds, oxygen at 10–12 L.

Objectives W8·7 · W7·4 · Ch 40

Oxygenation problem statements

The deck names five labels; the course adds activity intolerance and risk for aspiration. The hook: where does the problem live?

The five primary NANDA statements for oxygenation
LabelLives inCues that point hereCorrectly formed
Ineffective airway clearanceThe airwayCoarse crackles, weak cough, thick sputum, gurgling… R/T thick secretions and a weak cough AEB coarse crackles and RR 32
Ineffective breathing patternThe rate, rhythm or depthTachypnea, shallow breaths, accessory muscles; lungs may be clear… R/T acute emotional distress AEB RR 40 and tingling fingers
Impaired gas exchangeThe membraneA number: low SpO₂ or PaO₂, high PaCO₂; restlessness… R/T ventilation-perfusion imbalance AEB SpO₂ 86% and PaO₂ 58
Decreased cardiac outputThe pumpHypotension, tachycardia, weak pulses, cool clammy skin; in heart failure, edema. ATI adds a falling urine output, and crackles (fluid, not secretions) when the left side fails, edema when the right side fails… R/T altered contractility AEB BP 88/50 and HR 118
Ineffective tissue perfusionDelivery to a regionCool pale limbs, weak pulses, refill over 3 secondsIneffective peripheral tissue perfusion R/T reduced arterial flow AEB weak pedal pulses
Activity intolerance (added)Supply vs demandNormal at rest, worse with activity; needs help with ADLs… R/T imbalance between O₂ supply and demand AEB SpO₂ 95% falling to 89% on walking
Risk for aspiration (added)The airway, threatenedRisk factors only: weak gag, failed swallow screenRisk for aspiration R/T decreased gag reflex (no AEB)

Actual = R/T + AEB; risk = R/T only; the R/T is a mechanism, never the disease (Part 3, The red rule and every wrong statement). Risk for aspiration is an A problem.

“Impaired gas exchange” is not the answer just because it sounds the most serious A COPD patient with pneumonia has thick yellow secretions, coarse crackles, a weak cough and RR 32. Most people pick Impaired gas exchange, which sounds gravest, but there is no blood gas or saturation; every cue is about secretions. The answer is Ineffective airway clearance. Choose the problem by where the cues live, not by how serious its name sounds.

The deck's expected outcomes, made SMART

The deck's four outcomes name a direction but lack a time frame (and three lack a criterion):

DeckWritten so it can be evaluated
Improved gas exchange: no cyanosis or chest pain, SpO₂ >95%By discharge, the patient will maintain SpO₂ 95% or higher on room air, with no cyanosis or chest pain.
Relate causative factors; adaptive copingBefore discharge, he will name two triggers of his breathlessness and demonstrate pursed-lip breathing on stairs.
Optimal level of activityBy the end of the shift, he will walk the hallway twice with SpO₂ 95% or higher throughout.
Self-care behaviorsBy discharge, he will demonstrate his MDI with a spacer, rinsing and spitting after the steroid.
Check yourself · Part 6
Two COPD patients. A: 2 L cannula, SpO₂ 89%, alert and talking. B: turned up to 6 L overnight, SpO₂ 99%, newly drowsy with a headache, rate down from 22 to 10. Who first?
B. The better-looking number is the dangerous one: drowsiness, headache and a slowing rate mean CO₂ retention from too much oxygen. A is inside 88–92%. Rank by the function that is failing, not by the number.
A patient on a 3 L cannula sleeps mouth-open, SpO₂ 95%. A colleague wants a simple face mask at 3 L “because mouth breathing defeats the cannula.” Agree?
No, twice. Mouth breathing does not reduce cannula delivery, and 3 L is under the simple mask's floor of 5, so he would rebreathe CO₂. Check the premise, then the device's floor.
Non-rebreather: SpO₂ drifts from 92% to 86% and the bag collapses completely with each breath. Notify, switch to a 6 L cannula, move the probe, or check the connection and raise the flow?
Check the connection and raise the flow, then reassess and notify. The collapsing bag shows the oxygen is not arriving, so the probe is not the suspect; a cannula tops out near 44%.
Post-op: shallow respirations at 28, splinting from incisional pain, clear lungs, SpO₂ 96%. Gas exchange, airway clearance, breathing pattern, or activity intolerance?
Ineffective breathing pattern: rate and depth are wrong while lungs and saturation are normal. No number, no secretions, no rest-versus-exertion difference.
Key terms
cue clusterPED statementSMART goal intervention typetwo-part evaluationactivity intolerance
Objectives W7·6 · W7·7 · W7·10 · Ch 17–19

The deck's model: the fever case

The Management of Care deck carries one patient through every step: the instructor's own model of a finished plan (rules: Parts 3 and 4).

One patient through all five steps Management of Care deck, slides 34 → 42 → 43 → 48 — the deck's worked case
StepWhat the deck writes, paraphrased (temperatures in °F)
AssessingSubjective: she feels very chilled and is shaking all over. Objective: skin warm to the touch; temperature 101.2.
DiagnosisIneffective thermoregulation: hyperthermia R/T the inflammatory process AEB a temperature of 101.2 with shaking chills. Both kinds of cue sit in the AEB.
PlanningThe patient's temperature will decrease from 101.2 to 99 or below, orally, within 4 hours: a part of the patient as subject, a number, a route and a deadline. A 4-hour goal is short-term.
ImplementingFour interventions, typed below.
EvaluatingGoal met: after 4 hours, temperature decreased from 101.2 to 99.0 orally. Conclusion, then data.
The deck's interventionTypeWhy
Acetaminophen every 4 hours PRN for a temperature above 38.0 °C (100.4 °F)DependentA drug needs an order
Remove heavy clothing and blanketsIndependentNurse-initiated
Offer fluids every 2 hours, up to 2,500 mL in 24 hoursIndependentUnless a fluid restriction is ordered
Vital signs as ordered and PRN; report rising temperaturesMixedOrdered routine, plus judgment: too ambiguous to be a key
Objectives W8·7 · W7·4 · W7·6 · W7·7 · W7·10 · Ch 40

The heart-failure care plan

The program's model care plan is an oxygenation patient, and an item can enter at any step. A 78-year-old man, second hospital day with heart failure, on room air; you walk him to the bathroom and down the hall.

Step 1 · Recognize cues

Subjective: reportedObjective: measured or observed
“I get so winded walking to the bathroom.”SpO₂ 95% on room air at rest → 89% after walking 40 feet
“I have to stop and rest halfway down the hall.”RR 18 → 28; HR 82 → 108 after walking
“At home I sleep in my recliner. I can't breathe lying flat.”Three- to four-word phrases while walking; accessory muscles
His daughter: “Two weeks ago he walked to the mailbox daily.”Fine crackles at both bases; 2+ pitting edema at both ankles
“My ankles swell by the evening.”BP 132/78, temperature 36.8 °C: normal for him
Two cues that sit in the wrong column for most people “I can't breathe lying flat” names orthopnea and the mailbox report is checkable, so both feel objective. Both are subjective: you measured neither. Hers is also secondary, a separate axis (Part 2, Subjective or objective, primary or secondary). Reported is subjective until you measure it.

Step 2 · Diagnosis: cluster, then choose

The exertional cluster (normal at rest, worse on walking) says supply cannot keep up with demand; the fluid cluster (crackles, edema, orthopnea) is the heart failure itself. The worksheet asks for the main problem the nurse can treat:

HypothesisVerdict
Activity intoleranceThe priority. Cues appear only with activity; nursing treats it directly.
Impaired gas exchangeWeaker: no blood gas, and SpO₂ is normal at rest.
Decreased cardiac outputReal, but treated mostly with drugs; linked.
Excess fluid volumeA second problem on the plan.

Nothing on his list threatens the airway; his circulation problem (decreased cardiac output) is real but treated mostly with drugs; and his breathing cues (the drop to 89% and the short phrases) appear only with exertion and settle at rest. On his list that makes activity intolerance the high-priority problem. It is not a B label in its own right: set beside impaired gas exchange, as in the deck's high-priority question, it ranks second (Part 3, Prioritizing several problems).

Problem · Etiology · Defining characteristics Activity intolerance R/T imbalance between oxygen supply and demand AEB SpO₂ falling from 95% to 89% on room air while ambulating, RR 28 and HR 108 after walking 40 feet, and “I have to stop and rest halfway down the hall.” Not “R/T heart failure” (true, and the red-rule error) or “R/T shortness of breath” (a symptom as etiology).

Step 3 · Planning: one SMART goal

The model plan's “the patient will exhibit tolerance for increased physical activity by the end of the shift” has a subject and a deadline, but “exhibit tolerance” cannot be measured. Rebuilt:

The goal By the end of the shift, the patient will walk 100 feet in the hallway on 4 L/min oxygen by nasal cannula, keeping his SpO₂ at 95% or higher and without stopping to rest. All five components (Part 4, Goals: writing one); attainable, since 40 feet on room air today makes 100 feet with oxygen a reachable stretch.

Step 4 · Take action: interventions, typed (Part 4, Interventions)

#InterventionType
1SpO₂, RR, HR and work of breathing at rest, during each walk and 3 minutes after; stop if SpO₂ falls below 90%Independent
2Oxygen 4 L/min by nasal cannula for every walk, as orderedDependent
3High-Fowler's for rest, with a pillow on the overbed table to lean forward on (orthopneic) when breathlessIndependent
4Space the activity: walk after rest, not straight after a meal; cluster careIndependent
5Teach a pace at which he can still talk; teach-backIndependent
6Walk him on the physical therapist's progression planCollaborative
7Keep the ordered fluid and sodium limits with the dietitian's meal planCollaborative
8Give the prescribed diuretic; record intake, output and daily weightDependent (the drug)
Correctly typed, and still the wrong intervention A classmate adds “encourage fluids to 2 L a day to thin secretions”: plausible, correctly typed as independent, and wrong here, because in heart failure 2 L is a ceiling (Part 6, Secretions and inhaled drugs). A correct type says nothing about whether the intervention fits the patient.

Step 5 · Evaluate: a conclusion plus the data

The model plan's “provided 4 L oxygen by cannula while ambulating; sats maintained at 96%” reports what the nurse did: no verdict, no distance, no rest stops (Part 4, Evaluating).

VerdictTwo-part statementNext
MetGoal met: walked 100 feet on 4 L/min by cannula without stopping; SpO₂ 96–97% throughout.Terminate; write the next goal if the problem persists.
Partially metGoal partially met: walked 100 feet on 4 L/min with SpO₂ 95–96%, but stopped twice to rest.Reassess first (why did he stop?), then continue if on track or modify if stalled.
Not metGoal not met: walked 30 feet on 4 L/min; SpO₂ fell to 88% and he asked to return to bed.Reassess first (back to step 1), notify (it may now be gas exchange), then rewrite.
Why this chain only works if every link is specific “Goal met” has data only because the goal named a distance, a saturation and a deadline; the interventions move those numbers only because the etiology named a mechanism; and the etiology could only because step 1 separated the exertional cues. A vague link anywhere breaks the evaluation at the end.
Check yourself · Part 7
Which cue best favors activity intolerance over impaired gas exchange: basal crackles, orthopnea, SpO₂ 89% after walking, or SpO₂ 95% at rest?
SpO₂ 95% at rest. The 89% fits either label; the normal resting value shows the problem appears only with demand. Crackles and orthopnea belong to the fluid cluster.
To make “exhibit tolerance for increased physical activity by the end of the shift” evaluable, change the deadline to discharge, the subject to “the nurse,” or the verb and criteria?
The verb and criteria (walk 100 feet, SpO₂ 95% or higher, no rest stops). The deadline was fine; a nurse subject makes it an intervention.
Which best targets “imbalance between oxygen supply and demand”: the prescribed diuretic, walks scheduled after rest and not after meals, 2 L of fluid, or teaching about heart failure?
Scheduling walks after rest, which cuts demand. The diuretic is right but aims at the fluid problem. The etiology picks the intervention.
The goal is met in full, but walking the length of the hall still leaves him breathless. A classmate writes “Goal met; problem resolved; terminate.” Right?
Half. The goal is met, but the problem persists: keep activity intolerance on the plan with a harder goal. Terminate only when the problem itself is resolved.
Last pass · Ch 40 and the nursing process

Numbers to know cold

Governing figures only; any variant is in grey in its part.

NumberWhat it is
21%Oxygen in room air.
1–6 L/min · 24–44%Nasal cannula: about +4% per liter, 6 L ≈ 44%.
5–8 L/min · 40–60%Simple face mask. Floor 5: below it the patient rebreathes CO₂.
10–15 L/minPartial rebreather; the bag deflates only slightly.
10–15 L/min · 80–95%Non-rebreather. Floor 10. Fill the bag first; the highest FiO₂ of any mask.
4–6 L/min · 24–40%Venturi, high-flow: the barrel sets the %, at the flow printed on it.
95–100%Normal SpO₂. Write goals as “SpO₂ 95% or higher.”
Below 90 · 85 · 75%Below the monitoring line (keep it above 90) · further evaluation · life-threatening.
88–92% · 94–98%Targets on oxygen: COPD and CO₂ retainers · most other patients. Titrate; never withhold.
97%Oxygen carried on hemoglobin.
pH 7.35–7.45Below, acidosis; above, alkalosis.
PaCO₂ 35–45 mmHgThe respiratory number; CO₂ acts as an acid. Same normal for capnography.
HCO₃ 22–26 mEq/LThe metabolic number; normal in this exam’s uncompensated respiratory imbalances.
PaO₂ 80–100 mmHgOxygenation only. Hypoxemia: 60–79 mild, 40–59 moderate, below 40 severe.
pH low + PaCO₂ high · pH high + PaCO₂ lowRespiratory acidosis (hypoventilation: opioids, sedatives, COPD) · respiratory alkalosis (hyperventilation: anxiety, pain).
12–20 · 1:2Adult respiratory rate · inspiration-to-expiration ratio. Tachypnea above 20, bradypnea below 12.
30–60 · 20–40 · 15–25 · 16–24Respiratory rate: infant · age 1–5 · age 6–12 · 65 and over.
150 · 125 · 100 mmHgMaximum suction pressure: adult · child · infant.
10–15 s · 3 · 30 sSuction: each pass (child, tracheal: under 5–10 s) · most passes · least gap. Hyperoxygenate at least 30 s before and after.
20–30 cm H₂OCuff pressure: endotracheal tube (checked every shift) or cuffed trach.
8 hoursTrach inner cannula: at least this often (every 4 if secretions are heavy).
500 psiUse a portable cylinder only above it.
6 feetOxygen from stoves, fireplaces and heaters at home.
5–10 · 1–2 h · 3–5 sIncentive spirometer: breaths · every 1–2 hours awake · hold.
2 · 4Pursed-lip: in for 2, out for 4. Diaphragmatic: 5–10 minutes, 3–4 times a day.
1.5–2 L a dayFluid to thin secretions. Heart failure: 1–2 L is a limit, sodium 2,000–3,000 mg.
12–18 g/dLHemoglobin (Taylor; no course norm). Low means anemia.
5–6 L/minCardiac output at rest; CO = stroke volume × heart rate.
30:2 · 100–120 · 2 inCompressions: ratio · per minute · least depth. Bag-valve mask: a breath every 6 s, oxygen at 10–12 L.
1,200–1,500 mLThe most fluid removed at one thoracentesis.
Last pass · counts

Counts

CountWhat (another source’s count in brackets)
5ADPIE steps (ANA standards of practice: 6)
3 · 2 · 1Parts of an actual · risk · health-promotion statement
3 · 3Problem-statement types (older deck: 2) · problem types by who directs treatment
5 · 5Phases of assessment · types of assessment (older deck 4, Taylor 6)
4 · 5Steps of diagnosis (Taylor: 5) · possible conclusions
4 · 5 · 4Planning activities · goal components · outcome types (one slide: 3)
3 · 4Intervention types · parts of a written intervention (Taylor: 5)
5 · 7Rights of delegation · habits of implementing
3 · 2Verdicts · parts of an evaluation statement
6 · 6QSEN competencies · CJMM skills
4 · 3 · 3Respiratory divisions · processes of respiration · diffusion factors (the slide’s heading: 4)
5 · 2Primary NANDA oxygenation statements · the deck’s trach types: cuffed, cuffless
Last pass · ordering items

Sequences to recite

The tempting error is usually the step that feels like the real work jumping ahead of the check. The what-first orders: Part 4, Implementing and delegating.

SequenceIn order  ·  the tempting error
ADPIEAssessment → Diagnosis → Planning → Implementation → Evaluation  ·  “analyzing” is step 2 renamed, not a sixth step
ABCDEAirway → Breathing → Circulation → Disability → Exposure; stop at the first that fails  ·  going to the loudest patient
Scientific methodIdentify the problem → collect data → form a hypothesis → plan → test the hypothesis → interpret the results → evaluate  ·  collecting data first
Phases of assessmentCollect → identify cues and infer → validate → cluster → report and record  ·  clustering unchecked data
Steps of diagnosisSignificant data → patterns or clusters → strengths, problems and potential complications → conclusions  ·  a label from one cue
PED statementProblem (NANDA label) → R/T etiology → AEB defining characteristics  ·  a disease or a symptom after R/T
PlanningEstablish priorities → write outcomes → select interventions → communicate the plan  ·  “write the goals” first
Verdict to decisionMet → terminate (unless the problem persists) · partially met or not met → reassess → continue or modify  ·  continuing a met goal
Correcting a paper entryOne line through it → “mistaken entry” → initial and date → the correct entry  ·  a late entry squeezed into the old slot
ISBARRIdentify → Situation → Background (latest vitals) → Assessment → Recommendation → Read back
Incentive spirometerSet the goal → upright → medicate pain, splint → exhale, seal lips → inhale slowly → hold 3–5 s → repeat, then cough  ·  blowing in, or inhaling fast
Tracheal suctioningAssess need → hyperoxygenate → insert without suction → suction while withdrawing → reoxygenate, wait → mouth last  ·  mouth first; saline
Dislodged trachObturator into the spare tube → insert → remove obturator → secure → listen. Won’t go in: help, cover the stoma, prepare to bag
Starting oxygenCheck the order → explain the device, post no-smoking signs → set the flow and confirm it at the device → apply → reassess.
Last pass · archetype: same number, opposite meaning

Same finding, two answers

FindingHere it is fineHere it is the problem
BP 150/90Long-standing hypertension: may be his normalUsual 120/70: a red flag
RR 40Four months oldForty years old: tachypnea
End-inspiratory cracklesA newbornAfter surgery: adventitious
Barrel chestAge 80Age 35: obstructive disease
Bronchial breath soundsOver the tracheaOver peripheral lung: consolidation
SpO₂ 89%COPD on 2 L, alert, talking: inside 88–92%No chronic lung disease: under the 90 line; assess and report
SpO₂ 99%An alert patient with normal hemoglobinCOPD turned up to 6 L, newly drowsy, rate falling: CO₂ retention
A falling respiratory rateMore alert, breathing easier: recoveryHarder to rouse: exhaustion, late hypoxia
Vital signsStable post-op day 3: delegate to the UAPBack from PACU 20 minutes ago: the RN’s

Before you call a finding normal or abnormal, find the age, baseline, diagnosis or site it belongs to.

Last pass · not yet settled

Still open: ask the instructor

Seven open questions, each flagged “Ask the instructor” where it is taught. Until one is answered, use the third column.

QuestionThe versionsAnswer with, meanwhileWhere
Plain “prioritizing”: step 2 or step 3?Diagnosis develops a prioritized list; Planning’s first activity is establishing priorities.Match the stem’s wording; offered only one of the two steps, choose it.Part 3, What step 2 does
Progress short of the criterion101.2 fell to 99.8 against a goal of 99. The deck has no partial example.Partially met; reassess first. “Not met” means no change.Part 4, Evaluating
Compliance in emphysemaTaylor: decreased. Physiology texts: increased. The deck gives no direction.Build on lost recoil and air trapping; if forced, Taylor’s decreased.Part 5, The oxygen chain
The normal SpO₂Deck 95–100%; Taylor Ch 40 90–100%; NUR 120 deck 92–100%.95–100%; chronic lung disease, the prescribed target or 88–92%. At 90–94, assess.Part 5, Diagnostics
Hemoglobin and hematocrit normsNo course norm; Taylor gives two hematocrit ranges.The direction; hemoglobin 12–18 if forced.Part 5, Diagnostics
“Face mask: turn dial for %, use 10 L”A dial that sets a % belongs to a Venturi (Taylor: 4–6 L).A Venturi at its barrel’s printed flow.Part 6, Oxygen therapy
The CPR sequenceDeck: ABC, 1.5–2-second breaths. Taylor and BLS: CAB, 1-second breaths.Compressions first, 30:2.Part 6, Airway procedures
If you have one hour left Six stops, in this order:
  1. The six in-class points at the front, until you can say them without looking.
  2. Part 3: actual versus risk in Problem statements; the wrong-statement table in The red rule; the ABCDE box and the priority ladder in Prioritizing.
  3. Part 4: the boxes in both Goals sections; the trick rows in Interventions; the what-first table in Implementing and delegating; the reassess box in Evaluating.
  4. Part 5: early versus late signs in Hypoxia; what SpO₂ cannot tell you in Diagnostics.
  5. Part 6: the how-to-breathe table in First moves and breathing; the device table and its floors in Oxygen therapy; Oxygenation problem statements.
  6. Part 7: the heart-failure care plan, where both halves of the exam meet.
Read the recap
Part 1 · Ch 13–14

Recap: How Nurses Think

The nursing process has five steps, and the name to answer with is ADPIE: assessment, diagnosis, planning, implementation and evaluation. Analyzing, problem identification, analyze cues and prioritize hypotheses are all names for step 2, so ranking explanations is still diagnosis, not planning. The process is systematic, because each step depends on the one before, and dynamic, because the steps overlap; both are true at once. Critical thinking is the broad habit, clinical reasoning is that habit applied to one patient, and clinical judgment is the conclusion and action that follow, including a deliberate decision not to act. Sort the four blended competencies by what a behavior is for, so mediating between two siblings is ethical-legal.

Part 2 · Ch 15–16

Recap: Assessment

Assessing is the systematic, continuous collection, validation and communication of data, and the patient is the primary source. The five phases run collect, identify cues and infer, validate, cluster, and report and record, so validation comes before clustering. Name the five types of assessment by purpose: a home visit set against last month's findings is time-lapsed. Anything the patient or family reports is subjective, even a number such as a usual weight of 160 pounds, until a clinician or an instrument perceives it. Who supplied a finding is a separate question from how it was produced, so a wife's report is secondary and subjective. Validate a lone surprising number in a patient who looks well, but act on a dangerous cluster. Chart the cues you saw and heard, never a label such as noncompliant.

Part 3 · Ch 16–17

Recap: Diagnosis

The nurse treats a nursing diagnosis, reports a medical one and monitors for a collaborative problem, so a potential complication such as hemorrhage is collaborative. A possible problem means collect more data; at risk means write the risk statement. A premature diagnosis has too little data; an erroneous one misreads enough, and a healthy response is not a problem. An actual problem has three parts: the problem, related to the etiology, as evidenced by the defining characteristics. A risk problem has two, the statement and related to, with no as evidenced by, because nothing has happened yet. The red rule bans a medical diagnosis after related to: name the nearest cause a nurse can change, such as an imbalance between oxygen supply and demand. Symptoms belong only after as evidenced by, and a statement never blames anyone. With several problems, rank by ABCDE and stop at the first letter that fails; Maslow and actual-before-risk sit underneath. Rank by the function threatened, not by the loudest finding.

Part 4 · Ch 17–20

Recap: Planning, Intervening, Evaluating, Documenting

Planning starts by establishing priorities, before any outcome is written. A goal has five components: client centered, behavior, criteria of performance, conditions and time frame. In this course the S in SMART is subject, and the goal must fit this patient's own numbers. If the nurse is the subject, it is an intervention. Short-term means by the end of the shift (or sooner), long-term by discharge; the deadline decides it. Outcome types are set by what changes, not by the verb. Interventions are typed by who authorizes them, so oxygen is dependent, and anything given under a standing order is still dependent. Delegation moves the task, never the accountability. Evaluation gives met, partially met or not met, written as a conclusion plus data. A met goal is terminated; anything short of met is reassessed first, then continued or modified. Never chart care before you give it.

Part 5 · Ch 40

Recap: How Oxygenation Works and Fails

Ventilation carries air to the alveoli, diffusion carries gas across a membrane, and perfusion moves blood. On this exam the trachea is upper respiratory, as the deck puts it. Breathing is driven mainly by rising carbon dioxide: breathe less and the blood turns acid, breathe more and it turns alkaline. Obstructive disease fails on the way out and restrictive disease on the way in, so atelectasis is restrictive, and emphysema, a lung that fills and cannot empty, percusses hyperresonant. Early hypoxia speeds everything up, restlessness first; late hypoxia slows things down or turns them blue. A normal saturation is 95 to 100 percent, but it tells you how full the hemoglobin is, not how much there is. Low blood pressure interferes with it; high blood pressure does not. A low pH with a high carbon dioxide and a normal bicarbonate is uncompensated respiratory acidosis.

Part 6 · Ch 40

Recap: Oxygenation Nursing Care

Sit a breathless patient up first: high-Fowler's and orthopneic are positions you set up, while tripod is usually what you observe. Match the technique to the failing half of the breath: pursed-lip breathing for obstructive disease, deep breathing and the incentive spirometer, inhaled slowly, against atelectasis. The best teaching gives a number, a count and a cue the patient already lives by. Encourage at least 1.5 to 2 liters of fluid a day to thin secretions, except in heart failure, where 1 to 2 liters is a ceiling. Oxygen is a drug, ordered by device, flow and target. A simple mask never runs below 5 liters or a non-rebreather below 10, and the Venturi's barrel sets its dose. In COPD, titrate to 88 to 92 percent and never withhold oxygen. Suction only while withdrawing, trachea before mouth, and stop if the heart rate drops. Never clamp a chest tube for transport.

Part 7 · Ch 17–19, 40

Recap: One Patient, All Five Steps

In the deck's fever case, chills and a temperature of 101.2 become the evidence, the goal is 99 or below within 4 hours, and the evaluation reads goal met, then the data. In the heart-failure plan, the saturation is 95 percent at rest and 89 after walking, so the exertional cluster points to activity intolerance related to an imbalance between oxygen supply and demand, not related to heart failure. It is the high-priority problem on his list because nothing on his list threatens the airway, and the desaturation appears only with exertion, so it is not impaired gas exchange; it is not a B label in its own right, and beside impaired gas exchange it would rank second. The goal names a distance, a saturation and an end-of-shift deadline, and scheduling walks after rest targets the etiology. A vague link anywhere breaks the evaluation at the end.

What this is. A student-made study aid for NUR 110, not an official course document. It was built from the course's lecture decks (Management of Care, Nursing Process Revised and Chapter 40), its outlines and care-plan forms, Taylor, Lynn & Bartlett, Fundamentals of Nursing, 10th ed., ATI Engage Fundamentals, and what the instructor said in class. All wording is paraphrased; the decks, the textbook and ATI belong to their publishers and instructors, and a short phrase is quoted only where the exact wording is the point, cited to its slide.

Which source wins. What was said in class outranks the Management of Care deck, which outranks the Nursing Process Revised deck (and, for oxygenation, the Chapter 40 deck), then Taylor, then ATI. Where a slide has an obvious slip, the correct term is used and the slide's version is noted in grey. The governing figure is printed at full weight and any other in small grey type.

Coverage and policy change by term; check your course site for anything time-sensitive.